Roughage Quality of Second Crop Sorghum-Sudangrass Hybrids Sorghum bicolor x Sorghum sudanense Stapf.) Growing on Bilecik Ecological Condition
Abstract views: 143
/ 
PDF downloads: 87
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8219997Keywords:
Bilecik, second crop, roughage, quality, sorghum × sudan grass hybridAbstract
Sorghum, which has the ability to use water more effectively than corn and other cereals, can have high foarge yield even in arid conditions. The plant is important both nutritionally and with its high level of phenolic compounds in terms of animal health, yield and quality. In this study, it was aimed to determine the roughage quality of different sorghum x sudan grass hybrid (Sorghum bicolor x Sorghum sudanense Stapf. “SS”, Gözde-80, Aneto and Nutri honey) cultivars. The study was carried out in Bilecik ecological conditions as a second product in 2020. According to the results, the highest crude protein content was found in Aneto with 9.82% and Gözde-80 with 10.19%. The ADF and NDF ratios varied between 39.09-41.57% and 61.60-65.58%, respectively. The highest CT was in Aneto with 0.68%, and the lowest in Nutri honey with 0.59%. The TP, TF and DPPH contents of the SS hybrids varied between 14.35-20.03 mg GA g-1, 1.25-1.75 mg QE g-1 and 25.46-31.75%, respectively. As a result, all varieties showed the same performance in Bilecik ecological conditions in terms of roughage quality as the second product.
References
Arvouet-Grand, A., Vennat, B., Pourrat, A., Legret, P. 1994. Standardisation d`un extrait de propolis et identification desprincipaux constituants. Journal de pharmacie de Belgique, 49: 462-468.
Bate-Smith, E.C. 1975. Phytochemistry of proanthocyanidins. Phytochemistry, 14 (4): 1107-1113.
Baytekin, H., Tansı, V., Sağlamtimur, T., Okuyucu, F., 1991. Türkiye’de sorgum, sudanotu ve sorgum-sudanotu melezi yetiştirme olanakları ve bu konuda yapılan çalışmalar, Türkiye 2. Çayır Mera ve Yembitkiler Kongresi, 28-31 Mayıs 1991, İzmir, s:244-253.
Bean, B., Mccollum, T., Pietsch, D., Rowland, M., Porter, B., And Vanmeter, R. 2002. ‘‘Texas Panhandle Forage Sorghum Silage Trial’’, The Agriculture Program of Texas A&M University System, http://soilcrop.tamu .edu/publ ications/ pubs/910465si lage.pdf(Mayıs 2018)
Doggett, H. 1998. Sorghum’’, 2nd Ed John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York.
Dykes, L., Rooney, L.W., Waniska, R.D., Rooney, W.L., 2005. Phenolic compounds and antioxidant activity of sorghum grains of varying genotypes. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 53(17): 6813-6818.
Geren, H. 2000. Ana ve ikinci ürün olarak yetiştirilen silajlık mısır (Zea mays L.) çeşitlerinde ekim zamanlarının hasıl verimleri ile silaja ilişkin tarımsal özelliklere etkisi üzerinde araştırmalar, Ege Üniv. Fen Bilimleri Enst. Tarla Bitkileri Anabilim Dalı (Basılmamış Doktora Tezi), 251s.
Gosse, G. 1995. Rendement Energetique Et Bilan De CO2 D’une Culture, C.R. Acad. Agric. Fr., 81 (5): 93-107.
Grenier, C., Bramel-Cox, P.J., Noirot, M., Prasada Rao, K.E., Hamon, P. 2000. Assessment of genetic diversity in three subsets constituted from the ICRISAT sorghum collection using random vs. non-random sampling procedures, A. Using morpho-agronomical and passport data. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 101:190–196.
House, L.R. 1985. Aguide to sorghum breeding, second edition ed. International Crop research Institute fort he Semi Arid Tropics, Parancheru, India.
İptaş, S., 1993. Tokat şartlarında birinci ürün silajlık mısır (Zea mays), sorgum (Sorghum vulgare), Sudanotu (Sorghum sudanense) ve Sorgum-Sudanotu melezinin değişik olgunluk devrelerinde yapılan hasatların verim ve silajlık özellikler ile kaliteye etkileri üzerinde araştırmalar. Ege Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Doktora Tezi, s: 133. Bornova-İzmir,
Kardeş, Y.M. 2015. Türkiye yerel sorgum (Sorghum bicolor L.) populasyonlarından seçilen hatların tanelerinin besinsel özellikleri yönünden karakterizasyonu. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Erciyes Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, s:51 Kayseri.
Kimber, C.T. 2000. ‘‘Origins of Domesticated Sorghum and Its Early Diffusion to India and China’’, pp. 3-96. In C.W. Smith, R. A. Frederiksen (Eds.) Sorghum: Origin, History, Technology, And Production. Wiley Series in Crop Science, New York.
Murty, D.S., Kumar, K.A. 1995. Traditional uses of sorghum and millets. In: Dendy, D.A.V., (Ed.), Sorghum and Millets: Chemistry and Technology, American Association of Cereal Chemists, St Paul, MN, pp. 185–221.
Rooney, L.W., 2001. Food and nutritional quality of sorghum and millet, INTSORMIL.Annual Report, Project TAM-226, pp. 105–114. Available from: ‘‘http://intsormil.org/2001anlrpt/ 2001TAM-226.pdf’’ (Mayıs 2018)
Rooney, W.L., 2004. Sorghum Improvements-Integrating Traditional and New Technology to Produce Improved Genotypes. Advances in Agronomy, 83: 37–109.
Sanchez, A.C., Subudhi, P.K., Rosenow, D.T., and Nguyen H.T., 2002. ‘‘Mapping QTLs associated with drought resistance in sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench)’’, Journal of Plant Molekuler Biology, 48: 713–726.
Şenel, S., 1986. Hayvan Besleme. İstanbul Üniv. Veteriner Fakültesi Yayınları, No: 3210, İstanbul.
Tan, M., Serin, Y., 1997. Kaba yem olarak kullanılan tahılların besleme değerine yaklaşımlar. Atatürk Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 28: 130-137.
Woods, J. 2001. ‘‘The potential for energy production using sweet sorghum in southern Africa’’, Energy for Sustainable Development, 1: 31-38.
Woods, J., Hall, D.O., Muzondo, M.I., Gosse, G. and Soontornchainackseng, P. 1995. ‘‘Bioethanol Production from Sweet Sorghum’’, Interchange of Research and Experience Between EU and Developing Countries (Zimbabwe and Thailand), Brussels, EU, pp. 1–74.
Zulfiqar, A.M., Asim, M. 2002. ‘‘Fodder Yield and Quality Evaluation of the Sorghum Varieties’’ Pakistan Journal of Agronomy, 1(2-3): 60-63.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 MAS Journal of Applied Sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The journal is licensed under a 