Identification of “Natural Protected Environments with Qualifications” By CBS Method; A Case Study Of Izmir City, Çeşme District (Turkey)
Abstract views: 89
/ 
PDF downloads: 62
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8017972Keywords:
Natural protected areas, Cesme peninsula, Natural protectedAbstract
The efforts to increase the number of protected areas and the importance given to environmental awareness have increased noticeably all over the world. The classification of natural protected areas in Turkey is based on the law. This paper examines the determination of natural protected environments. According to the Resolution of Natural Protected Areas dated 2017 by the Ministry of Environment and Urban Planning in Turkey, natural protected environments are divided into the following three categories: “Critical Environments Under the Protection of Law”, “Natural Protected Environments with Qualifications” and “Sustainable Protection and Controlled Environments”. The study aims to evaluate the 99 polygons of natural protected areas that were determined by the Conservation Council of the Ministry of Environment. The paper solely studies the determination method for “Natural Protected Environments with Qualifications”. The borders of polygons that were determined by the Conservation Council of the Ministry of Environment were generated based on the up-to-date land-use images taken from the Ikonos satellite in 2020. “Natural Protected Environments with Qualifications” were determined in accordance with the charts that define the landscape specifications such as “Land-Use”, “Organic Natural Landscape”, “Inorganic Natural Landscape”, “Socio-economic Value”, “Aesthetics Value” and “Sensitivity”. Therefore, each polygon was evaluated separately based on “landscape specifications” and mapped as “Natural Protected Environments with Qualifications”.
References
Abdulhakim M.A., 2020. Land cover and land use classification performance of machine learning algorithms in a boreal landscape using Sentinel-2 data, GIScience & Remote Sensing, 57(1): 1-20.
Ankaya, F., 2018. The analysis of the natural protected areas in terms of landscape criteria in Çeşme district, province of İzmir, doctoral thesis.Department of Landscape Architecture, Faculty of Agriculture, Ege University, İzmir, Turkey
Ankaya, F., 2020. Mappıng Protected Areas By Gıs Method: A Case Study Of Izmır Cıty, Çeşme Dıstrıct (Turkey),Applied Ecology and environmental Research ,Internatiol Scientific Journal, 18(1).
Batunacun., 2018. Land-use change and land degradation on the Mongolian Plateau from 1975 to 2015- a case study from Xilingol, China Land Degrad. Dev., 29 (6): 1595-1610
Cook, E.A., Van Lier, H.N., 1994. Landscape Planning and Ecological Network. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
Ersoy İ., Daşdemir, İ., 2016. The Determination of the Effectiveness Level of Management in Protected Areas( Example of Soğuksu ve Yozgat National Parks ), Journal of Bartın Faculty of Forestry, 18(1).
Frederic, O., et al. (1988): Classification of natural areas for planning. – Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of Vermont, Burlington.
Senes, G., Toccolini, A. 1998, Sustainable land use planning in protected rural areas in Italy, Landsc. Urban Planning, 41:107-117.
Gonçalves, J., Mansur, K., Santos, D., 2020, A Discussion on the Quantification and Classification of Geodiversity Indices Based on GIS Methodological Tests. Geoheritage 12: 38-48.
Green, B., 1985. Countryside Conservation: The Protection and Management of Amenity Ecosystems. – Geroge Allen & Unwin London.
Gülez, S. 1990. An Assessment Method Developed for the Determination of Forest Recreational Potential. Istanbul University Journal of the Faculty of Forestry, 40.
İlter, E., Ok, K., 2004, Marketing principles and management in forestry, forest industry, form offset printing, Ankara, 488 pp.
Kınnon, M., 1986, Managing Protected Areas in the Tropics İnternational Union for conservation Of nature and naturel Resources and the United nations enviroment Programme, Gland, Switzerland
Mu, Y., Li, X., Liang, C., Li, P., Guo, Y., Liang, F., Bai, J., Cui, B., Bilal, H., 2021, Rapid landscape assessment for conservation effectiveness of wetland national nature reserves across the Chinese mainland, Global Ecology and Conservation, Volume 31, November 2021,
Niemeyer, J., Rottensteiner, F., Soergel, U., 2014, Contextual classification of lidar data and building object detection in urban areas, ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 87: 152-165.
Phua, M., Minowa, M., 2005, A GIS-based multi-criteria decision making approach to forest conservation planning at a landscape scale: a case study in the Kinabalu Area, Sabah, Malaysia, Landscape and Urban Planning, 71(2): 207-222.
Rafaai., 2020, Identifying factors and predicting the future land-use change of protected area in the agricultural landscape of Malaysian peninsula for conservation planning,Remote Sensing Applications: Society and Environment, 18: 100298.
Sezen, J., 2017, The Importance Of Envıronmental Awareness Towards Areas Protected In The World And Turkey, IBAD, 2(2): 165-177.
Shrestha, M., Piman, T., Grünbühel C.,2021, Prioritizing key biodiversity areas for conservation based on threats and ecosystem services using participatory and GIS-based modeling in Chindwin River Basin, Myanmar Ecosystem Services.
Singh., 2009. Using habitat suitability models to sample rare species in high-altitude ecosystems: a case study with Tibetan argali, Biodivers. Conserv., 18(11): 2893-2908.
Türkyılmaz, B. 1991. Turkey in the field of nature conservation and natural sites of identifying and determining the criteria to be used in order to classify Izmir/Kemalpasa research-based methods of sampling”. – Dissertation, Bornova-Izmir. Ege University, Institute of Natural and Applied Sciences, Department of Landscape Architecture, İzmir
Türkyılmaz, B., Kurucu, Y., Altınbaş, Ü., Bolca, M., Esetlili, T., Özen, F., Gülgün, B., Gencer, G., Güney, A., Hepcan, Ş., Özden, N. 2005. Usability of Geographical Information System in Determination and Classification of Natural Sites and Researches on Creating a Database in a Sampling Area (Kaynaklar -Izmir). – Project No: 102 Y 046.
UTL1;(http://izmirfx.mekan360.com/iys_tarihce,sehirID=35,ilceID=0,icerik=168.-tarihce-cesme-tarihi.html)
UTL2: https://www.google.com.tr /maps/ search
Uzun, O., Müderrisoğlu, H. 2010. Visual Landscape Quality in Landscape Planning: Examples of Kars and Ardahan Cities in Turkey. – Department of Landscape Architecture, Faculty of Forestry, Düzce University, Düzce, Turkey.
Yazici, K., Gülgün Aslan, B., Ankaya, F. 2017. Function of landscape scenery areas; a case study on Van Province. – Karabuk University Journal of the Institute of Social Sciences Special Issue: 168-176.
Yücel, M. 1995. Nature Conservation Areas and Planning. – Ç. Ü. Faculty of Agriculture Publications, Adana.
Yücel, M., Babuş, D. 2005. Doğa Korumanın Tarihçesi ve Türkiye’deki Gelişmeler, DOA Dergisi, 11: 151-175.
Zorlu Kaman, F., 2016. A Review of zoning rights transfer ın nature conservation areas and gelbashi special environmental protection zone, Ankara University Institute Of Natural And Applied Sciences, Master's Thesis, Department Of Real Estate Development And Management, Ankara
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 MAS Journal of Applied Sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The journal is licensed under a 