Determination of Forage Yield and Quality of Some Pearl Millet (Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br.) Populations in GAP Conditions
Abstract views: 267
/ 
PDF downloads: 232
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7452260Keywords:
Pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum), forage yield, quality, populationAbstract
The research was carried out to determine the forage yield and quality traits of different 23 populations of pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R.Br.) in GAP conditions. The study was carried out in Akçakale/Şanlıurfa in 2021 under second crop conditions. All populations were harvested during the milk-dough period of the grains in the spike. Although it varies according to the populations in the study, an average of the number of flowering days of the population varied between 68.0 and 84.0 days, plant height between 248.5 and 306.16 cm, the number of leaves on the main stem between 9.83 and 16.0number, the total number of stems between 3.5 and 7.16 number/plant, the dry matter ratio between 17.66 and 45.17%. forage yield between 798.16 and 2569.83 g/plant and hay yield between 272.12 and 1054.18 g/plant. In addition, forage quality characteristics such as: NDF are 52.04-65.65%, ADF are 37.84-45.75%, crude protein rates are 8.49-12.93%, digestible dry matter ratios 52.64-59.42%, dry matter Intake 1.83-2.30%, relative feed values 70.71-104.9, net energy lactation 1.23-1.36 mcal kg-1 DM. It was determined that calcium varied between 0.06-0.21%, potassium varied between 2.47-4.18%, magnesium varied between 0.06-0.25% and phosphorus values varied between 0.33-0.42%. It was concluded that 277, 1566, 2761, 2789, 3329, and 3432;3525, 1625, 2083, 2167, 2322 and 2704 were superior to the standard variety White in term of biomass yield and forage quality, In addition, it was concluded that these populations, which stand out in terms of forage yield and quality, can be evaluated in future breeding studies.
References
Abd El-Lattief, E.A. 2011. Growth and fodder yieldof forage pearl millet in newly cultivated land as affected by date of planting and integrated use of mineral and organiz fertilizers. Asian Journal of Crop Science, 3(1):35-42.
Andrews, D.J., Kumar, K.A. 1992. Pearl millet for food, feed, and forage. Advances in Agronomy, 48:89-139.
Angarawai, I. I., Aladele, S., Dawud, M. A., Turaki, Z.G.S., Yakub, Y. 2016. Genetic diversity among nigeria maiwa type of pearl millet germplasm. The Global Journal of Science Frontier Research, 16(3):1-6.
Anonim 2021 b. T.C. Çevre, Şehircilik ve İklim Değişikliği Bakanlığı,
Meteoroloji Genel Müdürlüğü, Şanlıurfa İli İklim Parametreleri. Erişim Tarihi: 15 Ocak 2022. https://mgm.gov.tr/?il=%C5%9Eanl%C4%B1urfa
Anonim, 2021a. GAP Tarımsal Araştırma Enstitüsü Labaratuarı, Toprak Analiz Sonuçları, Haziran-2022, Şanlırfa.
Anonoymous. 2018. SGS Agrifood laboratories. feed/ forages calculations. http:// www.agtest.com/articles/feed%20 and % 20 forages % 20 calculations_new.pdf. (Accessed 26.12.2018).
Asungre, P.A. 2014. Characterısatıon of of pearl mıllet millet [Pennisetum glaucum, (L), R.Br] germplasm in Ghana. Msc Thesis, Kwame Nkrumah Unıversity of Science and Technology, Kumasi School of Graduate Studies Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, 131p.
Aswini, M.S., Ganesan, K.N., Ezhilarasi, T., Sivakumar, S.D. 2022. Genetic studies on association and inter-relationship of green fodder yield and fodder quality traits in hybrids of fodder pearl millet [Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br.]. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Growth Evaluation. www.allmultidisciplinaryjournal.com.
Athoni, B.K., Ishwar, B., Pattanashetty, S.K., Guggari, A.K. 2016. Genetic diversity for yield and its component traits in Pearl millet [Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br.]. International Journal of Scinece and Nature, 7 (4):795-798.
Bidinger, F.R., Rai, K.N. 1989. Photoperiodic response of paternal lines and F1 hybrids in pearl millet. Indian Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding, 49:257-264.
Buso, W.H.D., França, A.F.S., Miyagi, E.S. 2014. Bromatological composition and dry matter digestibility of millet cultivars subjected to nitrogen doses. Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, 66 (3):887-893.
Dağtekin, Z. 2019. Çukurova koşullarında bazı biryıllık sıcak mevsim buğdaygil yem bitkilerinin adaptasyonu üzerine bir araştırma. Çukurova Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Tarla Bitkileri ABD, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, 141 s.
Dendy, D.A.V. 1995. Sorghum and the millets: production and ımportance. P. 11-26 in: Sorghum and Millets: Chemistry and Technology. D. A. V. Dendy, ed. AACC International: St. Paul, MN
Fribourg, H.A. 1995. Summer annual grasses. pp 463-472 in R. Barnes, C. J. Nelson, M. Collins, and K. Moore, eds. Forages an Introduction to Grassland Agriculture. Vol.1. 5th ed. Iowa State Press: Ames, Iowa.
Govindaraj, M., Selvi, B., Rajarathinam, S., Sumathi, P. 2011. Genetıc variabılıty and heritability of grain yield components and grain mineral concentration in India’s pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum (L) R. Br.) accessıons. African Journal of Food, Agriculture, Nutrition and Development, 11 (3): 4758-4771.
Hassan, Ul M., A-Ul-Ahmad H., Zamir S.I., Haq I., Khalid F., Rasool T., Hussain, A. 2014. Growth, yield and quality performance of pearl millet (Pennisetum americanum L.) varieties under Faisalabad conditions Pakistan. American Journal of Plant Sciences, 5, 2215-2223.
Heuzé, V., Tran, G., Hassoun, P., Sauvant, D. 2015. Pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum), forage Feedipedia, a programme by INRA, CIRAD, AFZ and FAO. https://www.feedipedia.org/node/399). Last updated on September 30, 2015, 14:02
Izge, A.U., Kadams, A.M. & Sajo, A.A. (2007). Agronomic performance of selected cultivars of pearl millet (Penniesetum glaucum (L.) R. Br.) and their hybrids in North-Eastern Nigeria. Journal of Agronomy 6(2): 344-349.
Jukanti, A.K., Gowda, C.L., Rai, K.N., Manga, V.K., Bhatt, R.K. 2016. Crops that feed the world 11. pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum L.): an important source of food security, nutrition and health in the arid and semi-arid tropics. Food Security 8:307-329.
Kidambi, S.P., Matches, A.G., Gricgs, T.C. 1989. Variability for Ca, Mg, K, Cu, Zn, and K/ (Ca +Mg) ratioamong 3 wheatgrasses and sainfoin on the southern high plains. Journal of Range Management, 42: 316-322
Kirchgessner M. 1985. Hayvan besleme, TÜBİTAK Fotoğraf Klişe Laboratuvarı ve Ofset Tesisleri, Ankara.
Kumari, M., Nagarajan, P. 2008. Character association and path analysis of yield components in pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum L. R.Br.). Madras Agriculture Journal, 95 (1-6):192- 195.
Lee, D., Hanna, W., Buntin, G.D., Dozier, W., Timper, P. Wilson, J.P. 2012. Pearl millet for grain. College of Ag. and Env. Sci., Univ. of Georgia Cooperative Extension. Bulletin #B 1216. http://extension.uga.edu/publications/detail.cfm?num ber=B1216 (accessed 30 Jul. 2014).
Marshall, B., Willey, R. W. 1983. Radiation interception and growth in an intercrop of pearl millet/groundnut. Field Crops Research, 7:141-160.
Medici, L.O., Gonçalves, F.V., Da Fonseca, M.P.S., Gaziola, S.A., Schmidt, D., Azevedo, R.A., Pimentel, C. 2018. Growth, yield and grain nutritional quality in three Brazilian pearl millets (Pennisetum americanum L.) with African or Indian origins. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências, 90 (2): 1749-1758.
Mesquita, E.E., Pinto J.C. 2000. Effect of nitrogen fertilize rates and sowing methods on yields of pearl millet (Pennisetum americanum L.). RvistaBrasileria-de-Zootecnia, 29: 971-977.
Morales, J.U., Alatorre, J.A.H., Nieto, C.A.R., Becerra, J.F.C. 2015. Forage production and nutritional content of silage from three varieties of pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum) harvested at two maturity stages. Journal of Animal & Plant Sciences, 27 (1): 4161-4169.
Pasternak, D., Ibrahim, A., Augustine, A. 2012. Evaluation of five pearl millet varieties for yield and forage quality under two planting densities in the Sahe. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 7(32): 4526-4535.
Pucher, A., Sy, O., Angarawai, I.I., Gondah, J., Zangre, R., Ouedraogo, M., Sanogo, M.D., Boureima, S., Hash, C.T., Haussmann, B.I.G. 2015. Agro-morphological Characterization of West and Central African Pearl Millet Accessions. Crop Science, 55:737-748.
Rahal-Bouziane, H., Semiani, Y. 2016. Pearl millet [Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br] landraces from south Algeria: variability, yield components, grain and panicle quality. American Journal of Agricultural Research, 1(1):38-46.
Rao N.K., Bramel, P.J. 2000. Manual of genebank operations and procedures. Technical Manual no. 6. ICRISAT. http://oar.icrisat.org/1086/1/RA_00356.pdf
Rasnake, M., Lacefield, G., Miksch, D., Bitzer, M. 2005. Producing summer annual grasses for emergency or supplemental forage. University of Kentucky, Cooperative Extension Service, College of Agriculture, AGR-88.
Sayğıdar, M.N. 2021. GAP koşullarında inci darısının ot verimi ve yem kalitesinin belirlenmesi üzerine bir araştırma. Şırnak Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Tarla Bitkileri ABD, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, 49 s.
Schroeder. J.W. 1994. Interpreting forage analysis. Extention Dairy Specialist (NDSU). AS-1080, North Dakota State University.
Shah, I.A., Rahman, H.U., Shah, S.M.A., Shah, Z., Rahman, S., Ullah, I., Noor, M. 2012. Characterization of pearl millet germplasm for various morphological and fodder yield parameters. Pakistan Journal of Botany, 44(1): 273-279.
Şenel S. 1986. Hayvan besleme. İstanbul Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Yayınları, İstanbul, No: 3210.
Taş, T., Yucel, C., Gündel, F.D., Öktem, A., Cetiner, I.H. 2021. Evaluation of sweet sorghum bagasse as an alternative feed resource for livestock in semi arid regions. MAS Journal of Applied Sciences 6(2): 303–311.
Taylor, J.R, Schober, T.J. Bean, S. 2006. Novel and non-food uses for sorghum and millets. Journal of Cereal Science, 44: 252-271.
Upadhyaya H.D., Reddy, K.N., Sastry, D.V.S.S.R. 2008. Regeneration guidelines: pearl millet. In: Dulloo ME, Thormann I, Jorge MA and Hanson J, editors. Crop specific regeneration guidelines [CD-ROM]. CGIAR System-wide Genetic Resource Programme, Rome, Italy. 9 pp.
Upadhyaya, H.D., Reddy, K.N. Gowda, C.L.L. 2007. Pearl millet germplasm at ICRISAT genebank-status and impact. Journal of SAT Agricultural Research, 3 (1): 5 pp.
Upadhyaya, H.D., Gowda, C.L.L. 2009. Managing and enhancing the use of germplasm-strategies and methodologies. Technical Manual No.10. ICRISAT, Patancheru, Andhra Pradesh, India. 236 p.
Upadhyaya, H.D., Reddy, K.N., Singh, S., Gowda, C.L.L., Ahmed, M.I., Kumar, V. 2013. Diversity and gaps in Pennisetum glaucum subsp. monodii (Maire) Br. germplasm conserved at the ICRISAT genebank. Plant Genetic Resources: Characterization and Utilization, 12 (2): 226-235.
Weichenthal, Burt A., Baltensperger, David D., Vogel, K.P., Masterson, S.D., Blumenthal, J. M., Krall, J.M. 2003. G03-1527 Annual Forages for the Nebraska Panhandle (2003). Historical Materials from University of Nebraska Lincoln Extension 236.
https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/extensionhist/236.
Yurtsever, N. 2011. Deneysel istatislik metotları. Tarım ve Köy İşleri Bakanlığı Tarımsal Araştırmalar Genel Müdürlüğü, Toprak Gübre ve Su Kaynakları Merkez Araştırma Enstitüsü Yayınları, Genel Yayın No: 121 Teknik Yayın No 56, 800s.
Yücel, C., Öktem, A., Gedük, Ş.A. 2021. GAP Koşullarında yetiştirilen tatlı sorgumun posası ile yapılan silajın bazı fermantasyon özellikleri. MAS Journal of Applied Sciences 6(4): 1064-076.
Yücel, C., Yücel, D. 2022. Tarımda değişen yapılar ve beklentiler. İnci darı (Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br.). Ed. Serap Doğan ve Nazlı Kalender. İksad publishing house, ISBN: 978-625-8323-16-0, S: 3-46.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 MAS Journal of Applied Sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The journal is licensed under a 