Evaluation of the Tolerance of Some Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Cultivars Against Ascochyta Blight (Ascochyta rabiei) in Different Regions
Abstract views: 229
/ 
PDF downloads: 118
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6976720Keywords:
Chickpea, ascochyta blight, artificial inoculationAbstract
In this study, 23 chickpea (Cicer aritinum L.) genotypes were evaluated in Adana and Şanlıurfa regions for their suitability to winter conditions and for their tolerance/resistance to Ascocyta blight. Disease nurseries were carried out in the research trial areas of Eastern Mediterranean Agricultural Research Institute-Adana and GAP Agricultural Research Institute-Şanlıurfa. In 2014-2015 growing season, four separate disease nurseries were established for 23 chickpea genotypes using four different pathotypes. The disease scorings and observations were conducted in those nurseries. Additional to 23 chickpea genotypes; the Canitez variety, which is known to be sensitive to Anthracnose blight, were used as a control. In this study, disease scorings according to the 1-9 scale made on the 7th day, 14th day and 21st day in the nurseries tgenotip artificially inoculated with four pathotypes identified in the legume cultivation areas of Turkey, and the suitability of chickpea genotypes for regional ecologies and winter sowing conditions in Adana and Şanlıurfa locations were observed. In this trial, as a result of artificial inoculation of four pathotypes, high disease scores were found in Adana location while the low disease scores were obtained in Şanlıurfa location for the same chickpea genotypes. It is observed tgenotip, irregular distribution and intensity of rainfall had positive or negative effects on Ascochyta blight in both locations.
References
Can, C., Ozkilinc, H., Kahraman, A., Iskender, E. 2005. Population analyses of Ascochyta rabiei; the agent of ascochyta blight of chickpea. Physiological-Biochemical and Ecological Features of Microorganisms, 14-16.
Chen W., Coyne C. J., Peever T. L., Muehlbauer F. J. 2004. Characterization of chickpea differentials for pathogenicity assay of Ascochyta blight and identification of chickpea accessions resistant to Didymella rabiei. Plant pathology, 53, 759-769.
Gaur, R. B. 2000. Influence of Ascochyta rabiei (Pass.) Labrousse on chlorophy II of chickpea. Indian Journal of Plant Pathology. 32: 127-128.
Güllü, B, Can, C., Özaslan, M. 2002. Gaziantep il ve ilçelerinde yetiştiriciliği yapılan nohutta zararlı fungal hastalık etmenlerinin saptanması ve karakterizasyonu. S: 54, XVI. Ulusal Biyoloji Kongresi, 4-7 Eylül, Malatya.
Hawtin, G.C., Singh, K.B. 1984. Prospects and potential of winter sowing of chickpeas in the mediterranean region, In: Ascochyta blight and winter sowing of chickpea. The Hague,Martinus Nijhoff/W.Junk Pub.,7-16.
Ipekesen S., Basdemir F., Tunc M., Bicer B.T. 2022. Minerals, vitamins, protein and amino acids in wild Cicer species and pure line chickpea genotypes selected from a local population. Journal of Elementology, 27(1):127-140.
İpekeşen, S., Biçer, B.T. 2021. Gübrelemenin nohutta (Cicer arietinum L.) bitkisel ve tarımsal özelliklere etkisi. ISPEC Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 5(2): 320-332.
Kaiser, W.J., Kusmenoglu, I. 1997. Distribution of mating types and the teleomorph of Ascochyta rabiei on chickpea in Turkey. Plant Disease 81:1284–1287.
Mart, D. 2006. Investigation of relations amang ascochyta blight and plant morphology with multi–regrassion on winter planted chickpea (Cicer arietinum) varieties in the Çukurova region, Ascochyta 2006, 2-6 Temmuz, Le Tronchet, France.
Mart, D. 2007. Nohut (Cicer arietinum L.) ıslah materyallerinin nohut yanıklık etmenine (Ascochyta rabiei (Pass.) Labr) karşı reaksiyonlarının araştırılması, Türkiye II. Bitki Koruma Kongresi, 27-29 Ağustos 2007, Isparta (Poster Bildiri- Fitopatoloji Seksiyonu).
Muehlbauer, F.J., Singh, K.B.1987. Genetics of chickpea. P. 99-125.In M.C. Saxena and K.B. Singh (ed) The chickpea, CAB Int, Oxon UK.
Nalcaci, N., Turan, A., Basbuga, S., Kafadar, F. N., Isler Ceyhan, D., Anay, A., Mart, D., Ogut, E., Sarpkaya, K., Can, C. 2021. Virulence and mating type distribution of didymellarabiei in chickpea growing areas of Turkey. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 23(1), 209-220.
Nalçacı,N., Kafadar F.N., Özkan, A., Turan, A., Başbuğa, S., Anay, A., Mart, D., Öğut, E., Sarpkaya, K., Atik, O., Can, C., 2021. Epiphytotics of chickpea Ascochyta blight in Turkey as influenced by climatic factors; ,Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection.
Reddy, M. V., Sing, K. B., Malhotra, R. S. 1992. Multilocation evaluation of chickpea germplasm and breeding lines for resistance to ascochyta blight. Phytopathology Mediterranean. 31: 59-66.
Reddy, M.V., Sing, K. B. 1984. Evalution of a world collection of chickpea germplasm accessions for resistance to ascochyta blight. Plant Disease, 65, 586-587.
Saxena, M.C.1980. Recent advences in chickpea agronomy. In Proceedings Of The First International Workshop on Chickpea Improvement, 28 Feb- 2 Mar 1979. Icrisat, Hyderabat, India, s.89-96.
Singh K.B., Malhotra R.S., Saxena M.C., Bejiga G., 1997. Superiority of winter sowing over traditional spring sowing of chickpea in the mediterranean region. Agronomy Journal, 89(1), 112-118.
Singh, K.B., Malhotra, R.S., Halila, M.H., Knights, E.J., Verma, M.M. 1994. Current status and future strategy in breeding chickpea for resistance to biotic and abiotic stresses. Euphytica. 73:137-149.
Singh, K.B., Reddy, M.V. 1993. Resistance to six races of Ascochyta rabiei in the world germplasm collection of chickpea. Crop Science. 33, 186-189.
Turgeon, B.G. 1998. Applications of mating-type technology to problems in fungal biology. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol.36: 115–137.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 The copyright of the published article belongs to its author.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The journal is licensed under a 