Digital Mapping of Soil pH and Electrical Conductivity: A Comparative Analysis of Kriging and Machine Learning Approaches


Abstract views: 95 / PDF downloads: 13

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14542860

Keywords:

Soil pH, electrical conductivity, machine learning, kriging, digital soil mapping

Abstract

Soil pH and electrical conductivity (EC) are critical soil properties influencing agricultural productivity and environmental sustainability. This study evaluates the performance of stacked machine learning models in predicting and mapping soil pH and EC values. Base models such as Ordinary Kriging (OK), Universal Kriging (UK), and Disjunctive Kriging (DK) were employed, and their outputs were integrated into a Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) neural network meta-model. The results reveal the superior performance of the MLP meta-model across all metrics. For instance, in predicting pH, the MLP model achieved an RMSE of 0.028, an MAE of 0.020, and an R2 of 0.858 on the training dataset. For EC predictions, the MLP model outperformed others on the test dataset, with an RMSE of 0.039, an MAE of 0.028, and an R2 of 0.900. In contrast, the UK and DK methods exhibited lower accuracy, particularly on test datasets. This study shows the advantage of modern machine learning algorithms in modeling nonlinear spatial relationships and their significant potential in digital soil mapping. The findings demonstrate the applicability of these approaches in enhancing agricultural productivity and supporting sustainable soil management practices.

References

Abakay, O., Günal, H. 2023. Ergani ovasında bazı toprak özelliklerinin mekânsal dağılımlarının belirlenmesinde lokal polinomal interpolasyon ve deneysel bayesyen kriging yöntemlerinin karşılaştırılması. MAS Journal of Applied Sciences, 8(4): 654-668.

Barikloo, A., Alamdari, P., Rezapour, S., Taghizadeh-Mehrjardi, R., 2024. Digital mapping of soil quality index to evaluate orchard fields using random forest models. Model. Earth Syst. Environ.

Butcher, K., Wick, A.F., DeSutter, T., Chatterjee, A., Harmon, J. 2016. Soil salinity: A threat to global food security. Agronomy Journal, 108(6): 2189-2200.

Cannone, N., Guglielmin, M., Malfasi, F., Hubberten, H.W., Wagner, D., 2021. Rapid soil and vegetation changes at regional scale in continental Antarctica. Geoderma, 394: 115017.

Durmaz, M., Günal, H., Budak, M., Çelik, İ., 2024. Harran Ovası’nda tarla ölçeğinde toprak fiziksel özelliklerinin mekânsal değişkenliği. MAS Journal of Applied Sciences, 9(2): 241-264.

Filippi, P., Cattle, S.R., Bishop, T.F., Odeh, I.O., Pringle, M.J., 2018. Digital soil monitoring of top-and sub-soil pH with bivariate linear mixed models. Geoderma, 322: 149-162.

Günal, H., Kılıç, M., Altındal, M., Gündoğan, R., 2021. Rapid spatial estimation of soil pH using machine learning under limited covariate conditions. Levantine Journal of Applied Sciences, 1(1): 30-37.

Haykin, S.S., 1999. Neural Networks: A Comprehensive Foundation, International edition. Prentice Hall.

Isaaks, E.H., Srivastava, R.M., 1988. Spatial continuity measures for probabilistic and deterministic geostatistics. Mathematical Geology, 20: 313–341.

Journel, A.G., Huijbregts, C.J., 1978. Mining Geo-statistics. London Acad. 600.

Kong, W., Chen, J., Zhu, P., 2024. Machine Learning-Based Uranium Prospectivity Mapping and Model Explainability Research. Minerals 14.

Kumar, V., 2007. Optimal contour mapping of groundwater levels using universal kriging—a case study. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 52: 1038–1050.

Ma, Z., Wang, P., Gao, Z., Wang, R., Khalighi, K., 2018. Ensemble of machine learning algorithms using the stacked generalization approach to estimate the warfarin dose. PLoS One 13.

Malvić, T., Balić, D., 2009. Linearity and Lagrange Linear Multiplicator in the Equations of Ordinary Kriging. Naft Sciences Journal, 60: 31–37.

Mesić Kiš, I., 2016. Comparison of Ordinary and Universal Kriging interpolation techniques on a depth variable (a case of linear spatial trend), case study of the Šandrovac Field. The Mining-Geology-Petroleum Engineering Bulletin, 31: 41–58.

Mousavi, A., Karimi, A., Maleki, S., Safari, T., Taghizadeh-Mehrjardi, R., 2023. Digital mapping of selected soil properties using machine learning and geostatistical techniques in Mashhad plain, northeastern Iran. Environmental Earth Sciences, 82: 234.

Oliver, M.A., Webster, R., Mcgrath, S.P., 1996. Disjunctive Kriging for Environmental Management. Environmetrics, 7: 333–358.

Pinkus, A., 1999. Approximation theory of the MLP model in neural networks. Acta Numer, 8: 143–195.

Somaratne, S., Seneviratne, G., Coomaraswamy, U., 2005. Prediction of soil organic carbon across different land-use patterns. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 69: 1580–1589.

Wackernagel, H., 2003. Multivariate Geostatistics: An Introduction with Applications, 3rd ed. ed, Heidelberg: Springer. Springer, Heidelberg.

Wang, R., 2018. Significantly Improving the Prediction of Molecular Atomization Energies by an Ensemble of Machine Learning Algorithms and Rescanning Input Space: A Stacked Generalization Approach. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A - ACS Publications, 122: 8868–8873.

Webster, R., Oliver, M.A., 2007. Geostatistics for Environmental Scientists., 2 nd. ed, Vadose Zone Journal. NJ, United States.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-22

How to Cite

ÖZTÜRK, M., KILIÇ, M., & GÜNAL, H. (2024). Digital Mapping of Soil pH and Electrical Conductivity: A Comparative Analysis of Kriging and Machine Learning Approaches. MAS Journal of Applied Sciences, 9(4), 1168–1185. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14542860

Issue

Section

Articles