1
Harran Üniversitesi, Ziraat Fakültesi, Tarla Bitkileri Bölümü, Şanlıurfa
2
Harran Üniversitesi, Ziraat Fakültesi, Tarla Bitkileri Bölümü, Şanlıurfa
3
Harran Üniversitesi, Ziraat Fakültesi, Toprak Bilimi ve Bitki Besleme Bölümü, Şanlıurfa
4
Harran Üniversitesi, Ziraat Fakültesi, Tarla Bitkileri Bölümü, Şanlıurfa
Abstract
In agriculture, many organic compounds are used as organic fertilizers to maintain plant production. Biochar organic soil amendments are commonly recommended for improving problematic soils due to their environmental friendliness, efficiency, and economic viability. In this experiment, canola (rapeseed) was used as the plant material. Zinc phosphate and cotton stalk biochar at different doses were used as nutrient sources. The study was conducted using a randomized block design with 3 replications, and plastic pots were used. All treatments were applied along with the planting process. In the control group, no treatment was applied, while in the second treatment, only 0.8 g of zinc phosphate was added to the soil, and the soil was mixed thoroughly. In other treatments, cotton stalk biochar was applied along with 0.8 g of zinc phosphate in the following doses: 1.2 g/pot, 2.4 g pot-1, and 3.6 g pot-1. The results showed that the application of zinc phosphate and zinc phosphate + biochar increased the canola plant yield in relation to increasing doses. Specifically, with 0.8 g zinc phosphate, the increase was 6.40%, with 0.8 g zinc phosphate + 1.2 g biochar it was 14.57%, with 0.8 g zinc phosphate + 2.4 g biochar it was 20.21%, and with 0.8 g zinc phosphate + 3.6 g biochar, the increase reached 25.75%. The highest increase was observed with the application of 0.8 g zinc phosphate + 3.6 g biochar, while the lowest increase was observed with 0.8 g zinc phosphate. The study demonstrated that the application of biochar positively contributed to the plant parameters.
Keywords
Biochar,canola,plants parameters,zinc
How to Cite
BEYYAVAŞ , V., CUN, S., SAKİN , E., & TURHAN , D. (2024). Effects of Different Doses of Biochar and Zinc Phosphate Applications on the Development of Canola Plants. MAS Journal of Applied Sciences, 9(4), 1159–1167. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14538522
📄Acar, R., Yorgancılar, M., Atalay, E., Yaman, C., 2011. The effect of different salt concentrations relative water content, chlorophyll content and plant growth in pea (Pisum sativum L.). Selcuk Journal of Agriculture and Food Sciences, 25(3): 42-46.
📄Afsahi, K., Nazari, M., Omidi, H., Shekari, F., Bostani, A.A., 2020. The effects of different methods of zinc application on canola seed yield and oil content. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 43(8): 1070-1079.
📄Alloway, B.J., 2008. Zinc in soils and crop nutrition. International Zinc Association.
📄Cakmak, I., 2008. Enrichment of cereal grains with zinc: Agronomic or genetic biofortification. Plant and Soil, 302(1-2): 1-17.
📄Dahunsi, S.O., Oranusi, S., Efeovbokhan, V.E., Adesulu-Dahunsi, A.T., Ogunwole, J.O., 2021. Crop performance and soil fertility improvement using organic fertilizer produced from valorization of Carica papaya fruit peel. Scientific reports, 11(1): 4696.
📄Dai, Y., Zheng, H., Jiang, Z., Xing, B., 2020. Combined effects of biochar properties and soil conditions on plant growth: a meta-analysis. Science of the Total Environment, 713: 136635.
📄David, J.M., 2015. Biochar and compost increase crop yields but the effect is short term on sandplain soils of Western Australia. Pedosphere, 25(5): 720-728.
📄De Corato, U., 2021. Compost and compost tea from on-farm composted agro-wastes ımprove the sustainability of horticultural organic cropping systems. In Agri-Based Bioeconomy (pp. 143-162). CRC Press.
📄Dhaliwal, S.S., Sharma, V., Shukla, A.K., 2022. Impact of micronutrients in mitigation of abiotic stresses in soils and plants—A progressive step toward crop security and nutritional quality. Advances in Agronomy, 173: 1-78.
📄Ding, Y., Liu, Y., Liu, S., Li, Z., Tan, X., Huang, X., Zheng, B., 2016. Biochar to improve soil fertility. A review. Agronomy for sustainable development, 36: 1-18.
📄Hossain, M.Z., Bahar, M.M., Sarkar, B., Donne, S.W., Ok, Y.S., Palansooriya, K.N., Kirkham, M.B., Chowdhury, S., Bolan, N., 2020. Biochar and its importance on nutrient dynamics in soil and plant. In Biochar, 2(4) :379–420).
📄Johnson, J.R., Saunders, J.R., 2002. Evaluation of chlorophyll meter for nitrogen management in cotton. Annual Report, 162-163.
📄Karim, A.A., Kumar, M., Singh, E., Kumar, A., Kumar, S., Ray, A., Dhal, N.K., 2022. Enrichment of primary macronutrients in biochar for sustainable agriculture: a review. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 52(9): 1449-1490.
📄Karmegam, N., Jayakumar, M., Govarthanan, M., Kumar, P., Ravindran, B., Biruntha, M., 2021. Precomposting and green manure amendment for effective vermitransformation of hazardous coir industrial waste into enriched vermicompost. Bioresource Technology, 319: 124136.
📄Khayat, M., 2021. Evaluation effect of farmyard manure (FYM) to improve cereal crop yield. Journal of Crop Nutrition Science, 7(1): 59-67
📄Kumar, A., Joseph, S., Tsechansky, L., Privat, K., Schreiter, I.J., Schüth, C., Graber, E.R., 2018. Biochar aging in contaminated soil promotes Zn immobilization due to changes in biochar surface structural and chemical properties. Science of the Total Environment, 626: 953-961.
📄Lazcano, C., Zhu-Barker, X., Decock, C., 2021. Effects of organic fertilizers on the soil microorganisms responsible for N2O emissions: A review. Microorganisms, 9(5): 983.
📄Lehmann, J., Rillig, M.C., Thies, J., Masiello, C.A., Hockaday, W.C., Crowley, D., 2011. Biochar effects on soil biota–a review. Soil biology and biochemistry, 43(9): 1812-1836.
📄Marschner, H., 2012. Mineral nutrition of higher plants (3rd ed.). Academic Press.
📄McHenry, M.P., 2009. Agricultural bio-char production, renewable energy generation and farm carbon sequestration in Western Australia: Certainty, uncertainty and risk. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 129(1-3): 1-7.
📄Mghaiouini, R., Benzibiria, N., Monkade, M., Bouari, A.E., 2022. Formulation of new biostimulant of plant and soil correction based on humic acids extracted by magnetized water from compost from the waste of coffee marc and cattle manure. Waste and Biomass Valorization, 13(1): 453-465.
📄Mousavi, S.R., 2011. Zinc in crop production and interaction with phosphorus. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 5(9): 1503-1509.
📄Radziemska, M., Gusiatin, Z.M., Cydzik-Kwiatkowska, A., Cerdà, A., Pecina, V., Bęś, A., Brtnický, M., 2021. Insight into metal immobilization and microbial community structure in soil from a steel disposal dump phytostabilized with composted, pyrolyzed or gasified wastes. Chemosphere, 272: 129576.
📄Rondon, M.A., Lehmann, J., Ramírez, J., Hurtado, M., 2007. Biological nitrogen fixation by common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) increases with bio-char additions. Biology and fertility of Soils, 43: 699-708.
📄Saibou, A., 2022. Winter and Spring Canola Response to Phosphorus and Zinc Starter Fertilization in Eastern Washington and Eastern Connecticut (Master's thesis, University of Connecticut).
📄Sakin, E., Yanardag, I.H., 2019. Effect of application of sheep manure and its biochar on carbon emissions in salt affected calcareous soil in Sanliurfa Region SE Turkey. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin, 28(4): 2553-2560.
📄Shaaban, A., El-Mageed, T.A.A., El-Momen, W.R.A., Saudy, H.S., Al-Elwany, O.A., 2023. The integrated application of phosphorous and zinc affects the physiological status, yield and quality of canola grown in phosphorus-suffered deficiency saline soil. Gesunde Pflanzen, 75(5): 1813-1821.
📄Shao, J., Tang, W., Huang, K., Ding, C., Wang, H., Zhang, W., Qari, S.H., 2023. How does zinc improve salinity tolerance? Mechanisms and future prospects. Plants, 12(18): 3207.
📄Thomas, S.C., Gale, N., 2015. Biochar and forest restoration: a review and meta-analysis of tree growth responses. New Forests, 46(5): 931-946.
📄Viketoft, M., Riggi, L.G., Bommarco, R., Hallin, S., Taylor, A.R., 2021. Type of organic fertilizer rather than organic amendment per se increases abundance of soil biota. PeerJ, 9: e11204.
,
Suat CUN
2