The Effect of Alternative Weed Control Methods on Yield Parameters in Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)
Abstract views: 28 / PDF downloads: 19
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14358364Keywords:
chickpea, weed control, sustainable agriculture, mechanical weed control, organic methodsAbstract
This study focused on the significance of weed control in organic chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cultivation and the effectiveness of alternative weed control methods. The environmental impacts of herbicide use and the development of resistance in weeds, which are among the chemical control methods, necessitate the improvement of alternative weed control methods for sustainable agricultural practices. In this study, the effectiveness of different methods, such as organic source materials, biological control agents, mechanical hoeing and other cultural practices on weed control was evaluated. The research was carried out in the area reserved for organic cultivation in the field crops application and research area of Dicle University Faculty of Agriculture, Faculty of Agriculture in the 2021 growing season. The experiment was set up according to the Randomized Block Design with 3 replications and Arda chickpea was used. Weedless control, weedy control, hand plucking before flowering, hoeing before flowering, hand plucking at pod stage, hand plucking at pod stage, hand plucking before flowering + pod stage, sowing with 20 cm spacing, sowing with 45 cm spacing, whey, whey + hoeing, pickle juice and pickle juice + hoeing were applied as weed control. Plant height, fresh weight, total number of pods, total pod weight, number of full pods, number of empty pods and number of grains per plant were investigated. Consequently, mechanical practices such as hoeing and manual weed control have reduced weed pressure and increased plant yield. Hoeing treatment increased the number of full pods by 28%, grain weight by 35%, and manual weed control reduced weed pressure by 20% and increased yield by 25% compared to other treatments. In the treatment without weed control, a 40% loss in yield was observed. By comparing different control methods in the research, it will contribute to the determination of sustainable weed management strategies and increase agricultural productivity. Furthermore, different control methods should be investigated in order to develop sustainable weed management strategies.
References
Adıyaman, C., Kahriman, A., 2021. Determination of resistance and morphological characteristics of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genetic sources to ımı group herbicides. ISPEC Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 5(3): 678–689.
Aslam, M., Ahmad, H.K., Ahmad, E., Himayatullah, M.A., Sagoo, A.G., 2007. Effect of sowing methods and weed control techniques on yield and yield components of chickpea. Pakistan Journal of Weed Science Research, 13(1-2): 49-61.
Avola, G., Tuttobene, R., Gresta, F., Abbate, V., 2008. Weed control strategies for grain legumes. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 28(3): 389-395.
Chauhan, B.S., Johnson, D.E., 2019. Weed management in organic cropping systems. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 57: 225-246.
Ceritoğlu, M., Erman, M., Yıldız, F., 2020. Effect of salinity on germination and some agro-morphological traits in chickpea seedlings. ISPEC Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 4(1): 82–96.
Demir, A., Tepe I., Erman, M., 2005. Effect of different control methods on weeds, yields, some yield components and nodulation in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Yuzuncu Yıl University Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 15(1): 71-75.
Dubey, S.K., Kumar, A., Singh, D., Partap, T., Chaurasiya, A., 2018. Effect of different weed control measures on performance of chickpea under irrigated condition. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 7(5): 3103-3111.
Johnson, D.E. Chauhan, B.S., 2019. Farmer education and weed management. Journal of Agricultural Science, 28(4): 345-358.
Kaya, M., Türker, O., Yılmaz, A., 2020. Nohut yetiştiriciliğinde yabancı ot kontrolü. Tarla Bitkileri Dergisi, 25(2): 123-132.
Korkmaz, Y., Kayan, N., 2010. Effects of different sowing methods and weed control on yield and yield components in chickpea (Cicer arietinum). Mediterranean Agricultural Sciences, 23(2): 157-162.
Kumar, V., Chauhan, B.S., Johnson, D.E., 2020. Integrated weed management in pulse crops. Journal of Weed Science, 68(3): 301-309.
Merga, B., Alemu, N., 2019. Integrated weed management in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Cogent Food & Agriculture, 5(1): 1620152.
Fontanelli, M., Frasconi, C., Martelloni, L., Pirchio, M., Raffaelli, M., Peruzzi, A., 2015. Innovative strategies and machines for physical weed control in organic and integrated vegetable crops. Chemical Engineering Transactions, 44: 211-216.
Peruzzi, A., Raffaelli, M., Fontanelli, M., Frasconi, C., Ginanni, M., Lulli, L., 2008. Physical Weed Control in Organic Carrot in Sicily (Italy). Cultivating the Future Based on Science. Volume 1: Organic Crop Production. In Proceedings of the Second Scientific Conference of the International Society Of Organic Agriculture Research (ISOFAR), Held At The 16th IFOAM Organic World Conference in Cooperation with the International Federation of Organic Agriculture Movements (IFOAM) and the Consorzio Modenabio in Modena, Italy, p. 20.
Singh, R.P., Kumar, V., Sharma, A., 2021. Herbicide resistance in weeds: challenges and management strategies. Weed Science, 69(4): 423-435.
Sözen, Ö., Peker, G.N., 2023. Determination of quality characteristics of advanced chickpea genotypes. ISPEC Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 7(3): 533–547.
Suso, M., Pardo, A., Hernandez, J., Vılla, F., Fernandez-Cavada, S., Zaragoza, C., 2003. Different weed control systems in tomato crop. Actas IX Congreso 2003 Sociedad Española De Malherbología, Barcelona, 4-6 De Noviembre, Madrid, Spain, pp.156-159.
Türker, O., Yılmaz, A., Demir, S., 2019. Nohut (Cicer arietinum L.) tarımında yabancı ot yönetimi. Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, 24(1): 45-54.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 The copyright of the published article belongs to its author.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.