Effects of Different Tillage and Herbiside Applications on Weed Control and Yield in the Double Crop Maize Agriculture
Abstract views: 29
/ 
PDF downloads: 18
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14313234Keywords:
Double crop maize, tillage, herbicide, weed, yieldAbstract
The aim of this study was to determine how different tillage systems and herbicide application impact weed density and grain yield in the double crop maize (Zea mays L.) agriculture after barley. For this purpose, a two-years field trial was carried out in the experemental areas at Agriculture Faculty, Dicle University, Diyarbakır, Turkiye in the 2022-23 growing season, comparing different soil tillage methods [conventional tillage (mouldboard plough+cultivator), reduced tillage (disc harrow) and no-tillage] and herbicide applications [pre-emergence, post-emergence, pre-emergence + post-emergence, weed-free control, weedy control]. In the experiments carried out with three replications according to the split plot design in randomized blocks, the main plots were composed of soil tillage methods and the sub-plots were composed of herbicide applications. The results of the study indicated that while different soil tillage methods had no effect on both weed density and the grain yield, herbicide applications significantly affected them. Both pre-emergence and post-emergence herbicide application significantly reduced the weed density and biomass.
References
Abbassian, A., 2006. Maize: International Market Profile. In Background Paper for the Competitive Agriculture in Sub-Saharan African, Economic and Social Department, Trade and Markets Division, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO): Rome, Italy.
Adeux, G., Munier-Jolain, N., Meunier, D., Farcy, P., Carlesi, S., Barberi, P., Cordeau, S., 2019. Diversified grain-based cropping systems provide long-term weed control while limiting herbicide use and yield losses. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 39: 42.
Ali, K., Khalil, S.K., Hussain, Z., Munsif, F., Waqas, M., 2011. Effect of varıous tıllage methods and nıtrogen management on weeds and maıze performance. Pakistan Journal of Weed Science Research, 17(3).
Arora, V.K., Gajri, P.R., Prihar, S.S., 1991. Tillage effect on corn in sandy soil in relation to water retentively, nutrient and water management and seasonal evaporability. Soil and Tillage Research, 21:1-21.
Ayaz, M., Özpınar, H., Yaman, S., Acar, A.A., Aksu, Y., Yavrutürk, Y., Niksarlı İnal, F., Aksu, S., Aygün, Y., 2013. İkinci ürün tarımında yaygın olarak kullanılan ve kullanılabilecek olan silajlık mısır çeşitlerinde verim ve kalite özelliklerinin incelenmesi. Harran Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 17(3): 1-11.
Berzsenyi, P., Bonis, B., Arendas, T., 1995. Investigations about the effects of some factors influencing the efficacy of postemergence weed control in maize (Zea mays L.), dang quoc lap, agricultural research ınstitute of the hungarian academy of sciences, 9th EWRS Syposium, Budapest, pp. 257-264.
Buhler, D.D., 1995. Influence of tillage systems on weed population dynamics and management in corn and soybean in the central USA. Crop Science, 35: 1247 - 1258.
Buhler, D.D., Liebman, M., Obrycki, J.J., 2000. Theoretical and practical challenges to an IPM approach to weed management. Weed Science, 48: 274-280.
Cardina, J., Herms, C.P., Doohan, D.J., 2002. Crop rotation and tillage system effects on weed seedbanks. Weed Science, 50: 448–460.
Carter, M.R., Sanderson, J.B., Ioany, J.A., White, R.P., 2002. Influence of rotation and tillage on forage maize productivity, weed species, and soil quality of a fine sandy loam in the cool – humid climate of Atlantic Canada. Soil and Tillage Research, 67: 85-98.
Chauhan, B.S., Johnson, D.E., 2010. The role of seed ecology in ımproving weed management strategies in the tropics. Advances in Agronomy, 105: 221-262.
Conns, J.S., 1987. Effect of tillage and cropping sequence on Alaskan weed vegetation: Studies on land under cultivation for eleven years. Soil and Tillage Research, 9: 265-274.
Doğan, M.N., Unay, A., Boz, O., Oğüt, D., 2009. Effect of pre-sowing and pre-emergence glyphosate applications on weeds in stale seedbed cotton. Crop Protection, 28: 503–507.
Giller, K.E., Andersson, J.A., Corbeels, M., Kirkegaard, J., Mortensen, D., Erenstein, O., Vanlauwe, B., 2015. Beyond conservation agriculture. Frontiers in Plant Science, 6: 870.
Güngör, M., Uygur, F.N., 2005. Adana ili mısır ekim alanlarında yabancı otlara karşı uygulanan kimyasal mücadelenin önemi ve ortaya çıkan sorunların araştırılması. Yüksek lisans Tezi, Çukurova Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Adana.
Hall, R.M., Swanton C.J., Anderson W.G., 2002. The critical period of weed control in grain maize (Zea mays). Weed Science Congress, 40: 441-447.
Hussain, S., Guo, R., Sarwar, M., Ren, X., Krstic, D., Aslam, Z., Zulifqar, U., Rauf, A., Hano, C., El-Esawi, M.A., 2021. Carbon sequestration to avoid soil degradation: A review on the role of conservation tillage. Plants, 10: 2001.
Işık, D., Mennan, H., Dok, M., Kaya Altop, E., 2000. Koruyucu toprak işleme ve doğrudan ekim sistemlerinde yabancı ot mücadelesi. Batı Akdeniz Tarımsal Araştırma Enstitüsü Derim Dergisi, 27(2):45-57.
Kersten, M., Hack. F., 1991. Effect of four tillage methods on growth of maize in Zambia.
Korucu, T., Say, M.S., Cerit, İ., Ülger, A.C., Kirişci, V., Turkay, M.A., Sarıhan, H., Şen, H.M., 2004. Farklı toprak işleme yöntemlerinin toprak sıkışıklığı ve verim üzerindeki etkileri. 22. Ulusal Tarımsal Mekanizasyon Kongresi, Kongre Bildiriler Kitabı, 08-10 Eylül, Aydın, pp. 12.
Lutman, P.J.W., Cussans, G.W., Wright, K.J., Wilson, B.J., Wright, G. Mc. N., Lawsan, H.M., 2002. The persistence of seeds of 16 weed species over six years in two arable fields. Weed Research, 42: 231- 241.
MacLaren, C., Labuschagne, J., Swanepoel, P.A., 2021. Tillage practices affect weed differently in monoculture vs. crop rotation. Soil and Tillage Research, 205: 104795.
Nichols, V., Verhulst, N., Cox, R., Govaerts, B., 2015.Weed dynamics and conservation agriculture principles: a review. Field Crop. Research, 183: 56-68.
Özcan, S., 2009. Modern dünyanın vazgeçilmez bitkisi mısır: genetiği değiştirilmiş (transgenik) mısırın tarımsal üretime katkısı. Türk Bilimsel Derlemeler Dergisi, 2(2): 01-34.
Reuss, S.A., Buhler, D.D., Gunsolus, J.L., 2001. Effects of soil depth and aggregate size on weed seed distribution and viability in a silt loam soil. Applied Soil Ecology, 16: 209-217.
Sağlam, R., Çıkman, A., Monis, T., 2010. Harran ovasında azaltılmış toprak işleme ve toprak işlemesiz tarım tekniklerinin uygulanması (II. ürün mısır ve susam yetiştiriciliği). Koruyucu Toprak İşleme ve Doğrudan Ekim Çalıştayı, Konya, 27 Mayıs.
Sırrı, M., Özaslan, C., Fidan, M., 2020. Siirt’te doğal yayılış gösteren parazit yabancı otlar ve konukçuları. ISPEC Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, 4(4): 808–822.
Samarajeewa, K.B.D.P., Horiuchi, T., Oba, S., 2006. Finger millet (Eleuchi corocana L. Gaertn) as a cover crop on weed control, growth and yield of soybean under different tillage systems. Soil and Tillage Research, 90: 93-99.
Shrestha, J., Timsina, K.T., Subedi, S., Pokhrel, D., Chaudhary, A., 2019. Sustainable weed management in maize (Zea mays L.) production: a review in perspective of southern Asia. Turkish Journal of Weed Science, 22(1):133-143.
Silva, P.S.L., Silva, P.I.B., Silva, K.M.B., Oliveira, V.R., Pontes Filho, F.S.T., 2011. Corn growth and yield in competition with weeds. Planta daninha, 29(4): 793-802.
So, H.B., Grabski, A., Desborough, P., 2009. The impact of 14 Years of Conventional and No-Till Cultivation on the Physical Properties and Crop Yields of a Loam Soil at Grafton NSW Australia.
Sushaa, V.S., Dasa, T.K., Natha, C.P., Pandeyb, R., Paul, S., Ghosh, S., 2018. Impacts of tillage and herbicide mixture on weed interference, agronomic productivity and profitability of a maize – Wheat system in the Northwestern Indo-Gangetic Plains. Field Crops Research, 219: 180–191.
Usman, K., Khalil, S.K., Khan, M.A., 2010. Impact of tillage and herbicides on weed density and some physiological traits of wheat under rice-wheat cropping system. Sarhad Journal of Agriculture, 26(4): 475-487.
Turhal, K., 2021. Türkiye’de yıllara göre mısır (Zea mays L.) ekim alanları ile verimin mısır üretimine olan etkileri. ISPEC Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, 5(2): 418–425.
Yalçın, H., Çakır, E., Akdemir, H., Öcel, T., Soya, H., 2003. Doğrudan ekim ve dipkazan uygulamalarının ikinci ürün mısırda verime etkileri. 21. Ulusal Tarımsal Mekanizasyon Kongresi, Konya, pp. 167-171.
Zeren, Y., Işık, A., Özgüven, F., 1993. GAP bölgesinde ikinci ürün tane mısır yetiştirmede farklı toprak işleme yöntemlerinin karşılaştırılması. 5. Uluslararası Tarımsal Mekanizasyon ve Enerji Kongresi, İzmir, pp. 43-54.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 The copyright of the published article belongs to its author.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The journal is licensed under a 