1
Adana Şehir Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Adana
Abstract
Cross-sectional studies are conducted at a single point in time or over a short period of time. They are usually conducted to estimate prevalence for a particular population. In addition to relevant information, data on individual characteristics, including exposure to risk factors, can also be collected. In this way, cross-sectional studies provide a 'snapshot'. In a cross-sectional study design, the aim of the study is to find the prevalence of the outcome of interest for the population or subgroups within the population at a specific time point. They are easy to conduct and are the most common study designs reported in most medical journals. The research can be completed in a relatively short time, depending on the required sample size and access to the study population. Cross-sectional studies are extensively employed in epidemiology as well as other research fields. Cross-sectional studies are usually carried out by having participants complete a questionnaire. There are differences: occasionally the interviewer will pose the questions and record the responses from the participants. Respondents occasionally use a computer or the internet to complete the answers. Survey participants occasionally provide a blood sample or other biological measurement in addition to their questionnaire responses.
Keywords
Medical research designs,observational,cross sectional studies
How to Cite
İRDAY, K. (2024). Medical Cross-Sectional Research Design. MAS Journal of Applied Sciences, 9(3), 658–667. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13319429
📄Cataldo, R., Arancibia, M., Stojanova, J., Papuzinski, C., 2019. General concepts in biostatistics and clinical epidemiology: Observational studies with cross-sectional and ecological designs. Medwave, 19(08).
📄Gilmartin-Thomas, J.F., Liew, D., Hopper, I., 2018. Observational studies and their utility for practice. Australian prescriber, 41(3): 82.
📄Hemed, M., 2015. Cross-sectional studies. Training Course in Sexual and Reproductive Health Research Geneva, 12.
📄Leahy, C.M., Peterson, R.F., Wilson, I.G., Newbury, J.W., Tonkin, A. L., Turnbull, D., 2010. Distress levels and self-reported treatment rates for medicine, law, psychology and mechanical engineering tertiary students: cross-sectional study. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 44(7): 608-615.
📄Lebo, M.J., Weber, C., 2015. An effective approach to the repeated cross‐sectional design. American Journal of Political Science, 59(1): 242-258.
📄Mann, C.J., 2003. Observational research methods. Research design II: cohort, cross sectional, and case-control studies. Emergency Medicine Journal, 20(1): 54-60.
📄Mukherjee, D., Roy, S., 2023. Cross-sectional study. In Translational Radiation Oncology (pp. 237-241). Academic Press.
📄Obermeyer, Z., Emanuel, E.J., 2016. Predicting the future—big data, machine learning, and clinical medicine. New England Journal of Medicine, 375(13): 1216-1219.
📄Ortega-Loubon, C., Culquichicón, C., Correa, R., 2017. The importance of writing and publishing case reports during medical training. Cureus, 9(12).
📄Pan, X., 2022. Repeated cross-sectional design. In Encyclopedia of gerontology and population aging (pp. 4246-4250). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
📄Rezigalla, A.A., 2020. Observational study designs: Synopsis for selecting an appropriate study design. Cureus, 12(1).