The Effect of Different Chemical Applications Helping The Harvest on The Fiber Quality of Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) in Normal and Late Sowing
Abstract views: 243
/ 
PDF downloads: 126
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7640320Keywords:
Cotton, defoliation, sowing date, yield, open bollAbstract
This study was carried out to determine the effects of different defoliants on yield and fiber technological properties in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) in normal sowing (May 5) and late sowing (June 5). The study was carried out in the Sultantepe village of Eyyübiye district of Şanlıurfa province in the 2020-2021 growing seasons according to the randomized blocks of divided plots experimental design with 3 replications. From defoliant applications, Finish Pro 765 (720 g l-1 Ethephon + 45 g l-1 Cyclanilide), Genesiss (200 g l-1 (Carfentrazone-ethyl + 30 g l-1 Diuron), Ethephon (720 g l-1), Son Final (480 g) /l Ethephon+60 g l-1 Cyclanilide) were applied in normal and late sowing when 60% of the bolls were opened. In the study, ginning outturn (%), 100 seed weight (g), fiber fineness (mic), fiber strength (g tex-1), fiber uniformity (%), fiber length (mm), reflectance value (Rd), yellowness (b+) and ratio of trash matter (TrAr %) were determined by examining. According to the results obtained from the study, it was observed that the sowing time had a significant effect on the fiber quality, and the defoliant applications had no effect other than the fiber fineness.
References
Ataş, E., 2008. Farklı zamanlarda ekilen pamukta değişik defoliyant uygulama zamanının verim ve kaliteye etkisi. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Çukurova Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Adana.
Bednarz, C.W., Shurley, D., Anhony, W.S., 2002. Losses in yield, quality and profatibilty of cotton from improper harvest timing. Agronomy Journal, 94: 1004-1011.
Beyyavaş, V., 2009. The effect of different plant densities and mepiquat chloride applications on cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) yield and yield components in normal and late planting periods. PhD Thesis, Harran University, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Sanliurfa.
Beyyavaş, V., 2019. The effect of different harvest aiding chemicals on yield and yield components of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Applied Ecology and Envıronmental Research, 17 (2): 2733-2743.
Bondada, B.R., Oosterhuis, D.M., 2001. Conopy photosynthesis, specific leaf weight and yield components of cotton under varying nitrogen supply. Journal of Plant Nitrition, 24: 469-477.
Çiçek, B., Oğlakçı, M, Çopur, O., 2003. Pamukta yaprak döktürmenin verim ve kalite unsurlarına etkisi. Harran Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi. 7(1): 45-52.
Çopur, O., Demirel, U., Polat, R., Gür, M.A., 2010. Effect of different defoliants and application times on the yield and quality components of cotton in semiarid conditions. African Journal of Biotechnology, 9(14): 2095.
Denizdurduran, N., 2008. Kahramanmaraş koşullarında yaprak döktürücü uygulama zamanlarının pamukta (Gossypium hirsutum L.) verim ve kalite özelliklerine etkisi. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Kahramanmaraş.
Denizdurduran, N., Efe, L., 2009. The influence of defo¬liation timing on yield and quality properties of Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) under Kahramanmaras conditions. The 8th National Field Crops Congress of Turkey, 19-22 October, Hatay.
Edmisten, K.L., 1998. The cotton plant. In: 1998 Cotton Information. North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service, Pub. AG-417.
El-Debaby, A.S., Hammam, G.Y., Nagıb, M.A., 1995. Effect of planting date, N and P application levels on the yield of Giza 80 cotton cultivar. Annals of Agricultural Science, Mostohor, 33(2): 465-481.
Göktaş, A., Görmüş, Ö., 2021. Farklı yaprak döktürücü uygulama zamanlarının pamuk çeşitlerinde nep. Tohum kabuğu parçacık oluşumu ve lif kalitesi üzerine etkileri. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Çukurova Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Adana.
Görmüş, O., Yücel, C., 2002. Different planting date and potassium fertility effects on cotton yield and fiber properties in the Çukurova region, Turkey. Field Crops Research, 78:141-149.
Haliloğlu, H., Beyyavaş, V., Cevheri, C.İ., 2020. The effect of defoliant application on yield and yield components of some cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) cultivars at timely and late sowing. International Journal of Agriculture, Environment and Food Sciences, 4(2): 157-164.
Jost, P., 2008. Cotton Fiber Quality and the Issues in Georgia. http://pubs.caes.uga.edu/caespubs/pubcd/B1289.htm (Erişim tarihi: 10.12.2022)
Karademir, E., Karademir, C., Basbag, S., 2003. Determination the effect of defoliation timing on cotton yield and quality. Journal of Central European Agriculture, 8(3): 357-362.
Karademir, E., Karademir, Ç., Başbag, S., 2007. Determi¬nation the effect of defoliation timing on cotton yield and quality. Journal of Central European Agriculture, 8(3): 357-362.
Karaman, M.Ş., 2019. Farklı zaman ve dozda uygulanan yaprak döktürücülerin pamuğun (Gossypium hirsutum L.) verim ve kalite özelliklerine etkisi. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Hatay.
Kechagia, U.E., Harig, H., 1998. New perspectives in ımproving cotton fiber quality and processing efficiency. Proceedings of the World Cotton Research Conference-2. Athens. Greece. 85-93.
Kechagia, U.E., Harig, H., 2003. New perspectives in improving cotton fiber quality and processing efficiency. [http://www.icac.org /cotton_info/pu blications/tech seminar/Pub_tech _seminar/tis_200 (Erişim tarihi: 15.05.2011).
Kıllı, F., Bölek, Y., 2005. Timing of planting is cricial for cotton yield. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica Section B-Soil and Plant Science, 56(2):155-160.
Krieg, D.R., 2002. Fiber quality genetic and environmental affectors. texsas tech university lubbock. TEXAS. [www.cottoninc.com/2002ConferencePresentations /Fiber Quality Genetics]. Erişim tarihi:20.07.2017
Larson, J.A., Gwathmey, C.O., Hayes, R.M., 2005. Effect of defolation timing desiccation on net revenuas from ultra-narrow-row. Journal of Cotton Science, 9(4): 204- 224.
Mert, M. Çalişkan, M.E., Günel, E., 1999. Yaprak döktürücü uygulamasının pamuğun (Gossypium hirsutum L.) verim ve lif özelliklerine etkisi. Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi A: 1-2.
Ming-Wei, D.U., Xiao-Ming, R., Xiao-Li, T., Liu-Sheng, D., Ming-Cai, Z., Wei-Ming, T., Zhao-Hu, L., 2013. Evaluation of harvest aid chemicals for the cotton-winter wheat double cropping system. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 12(2): 273-282.
Mrunalini, K.M., Sree, R., Murthy, V.R.K. 2018. Effectiveness of harvest – aid defoliants and environmental conditions in high density cotton. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 7(02): 2312-2316.
Özkan, N., Görmüş, Ö. 2002. Harran ovası şartlarında yaprak döktürücü uygulama dönemlerinin pamuğun (Gossypium hirsutum L.) bazı kalite özellikleri üzerine etkisi. Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 7(1-2): 27-30.
Porter, P.M., Sullivan, M.J., Harvey, L.H., 1996. Cotton cultivar response to planting dates on the Southeastern Coastal Plain. Journal of Production Agriculture, 9(2): 223-227.
Qamar, R., Ur-Rehman, A., Javeed, H.M.R., Saqib, M., Shoaib, M., Ali, A., Mazhar Ali, M., 2016. Influence of sowing time on cotton growth, yield and fiber quality. International Journal of Biology and Biotechnology, 13(1): 59-67.
Raghavendra-Reddy., Raghavendra, T., Reddy, Y.R., 2020. Efficacy of defoliants on yield and fibre quality of American cotton in semi-arid conditions. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research, 54(3): 404-407.
Silvertooth, J.C., 2001. Crop management for optimum fiber quality and yield. The University of Arizona. Cooperative Extension. [http://cals.arizona.edu/pubs/crops/az1219.pdf], (Erişim tarihi: 11.12.2010).
Singh, K., Rathore, P., 2015. Effect of different defoliants and their rate and time of application on American cotton cultivars under semi-arid conditions of North-Western India. Research on Crops, 16(2): 258-263.
Snipes, C.E., Baskin, C.C., 1994. Influence of early defoli¬ation on cotton yield, seed quality, and fiber properties. Field Crops Research, 37(2): 137-143.
Sokat, Y., 2008. Researches on effects of defoliant applications on yield, fiber and seed quality in second crop cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) cultivation. PhD Thesis, Ege University, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, İzmir.
Sokat, Y., Gürel, A., 2010. İkinci ürün pamuk (Gossypium hirsutum L.) tarımında defoliant uygulamalarının verim. lif ve tohum kalitesi üzerine etkilerinin araştırılması. Anadolu Ege Tarımsal Araştırma Enstitüsü Dergisi, 20(1): 91-110.
Süllü, S., 2001. Determine growing degree days at growth stages for cotton varieties (Gossypium hirsutum L.) at different planting dates in Çukurova region. M.Sc. Thesis, Cukurova University, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Adana.
Tariq, M., Afzal, M.N., Muhammad, D., Ahmad, S., Shahzad, A.N., Kiran, A., Wakeel, A., 2018. Relationship of tissue potassium content with yield and fiber quality components of Bt cotton as influenced by potassium application methods. Field Crop Research, 229:37–43
Tashaev, A., 2016. Effect of defoliants and fertilizers on yield and quality of upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Journal of Cotton Research and Development, 29: 57–60.
Tüik, 2021. https://data.tuik.gov.tr/ Bulten/Index?p=Bitkisel-Uretim-Ista tistikleri-2021-37249 (Erişim tarihi: 28.12.2021).
Tülemen, A.S. 2015. The effects of defoliants on important morphological, agronomical and technological features on short season cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). M.Sc. Thesis, Adnan Menderes University, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Aydın.
Tülemen, A.S., Kaynak, M.A., 2016. İkinci ürün pamukta (Gossypium hirsutum L.) yaprak döktürücü kimyasalların verim ve kalite özellikleri üzerine etkisi. Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 13(1): 115-120.
Worley, S.J.R., Harmon, H.R., Harrel, D.C., Culp, T.W., 1976. Ontogenetic model of coton yield. Crop Science, 16: 30-34.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 The copyright of the published article belongs to its author.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The journal is licensed under a 