Compact City: A Comparative Study of Urban Policies


Abstract views: 15 / PDF downloads: 14

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7472639

Keywords:

Compact city, density, mixed-use, urban sprawl, urban compactness policy

Abstract

After urban sprawl was revealed as an undesirable phenomenon of urbanization due to its physical, economic and social negativities, various urban models have been introduced to minimize the damages of urban sprawl. One of the most significant examples of these city models is “compact city”. Although many countries in the world have not adopted the compact city model yet, there are countries which have taken successful steps in this regard. In this context, the current research has suggested a theoretical framework to define compact city with its chief indicators. Later, four significant cities in terms of urban compaction are chosen as case studies from diverse parts of the world. A comparative assessment method was applied to find similarities and differences among the case studies in terms of compact city interventions. In the light of compact city indicators cited in literature, the present study aims to reveal what kind of planning policies should be adopted and what steps can be taken to achieve a successful compact city model.  The result of the study clarifies the common characteristics of cities that are successful in terms of urban compactness.

 

References

Work Distance: The Effect of the Compact City. Journal of Regional Studies, 46(6):687-706.

Burton, E. 2002. Measuring urban compactness in UK towns and cities. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 29: 219-250.

Çalışkan, O. 2004. Urban Compactness: A Study Of Ankara Urban Form. Ankara: Middle East Technical University.

Cervero, R., Kockelman, K. 1997. Travel demand and the 3Ds: Density, diversity, and design. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 2(3): 199-219.

Cervero, R. 1998. Creating a Linear City with a Surface Metro: Curitiba, Brazil. In The Transit Metropolis: A Global Inquiry . (1st ed., ss. 265-293). Washington, D.C.: Island Press.

Cervero, R. 2014. Transport Infrastructure and the Environment in the Global South: Sustainable Mobility and Urbanism. Jurnal Perencanaan Wilayah dan Kota, 25(3).

Couret, D. 2022. Sustainable urban development. Cuban challenges. International Journal of Urban Sustainable Development, 1-5.

Dielman, F. 1997. “Planning compact urban form: Randstad Holland 1965-95”, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 29:1711-1715.

Faludi, A., Van der Valk, A. 1994. Rule and Order: Dutch Planning Doctrine in the Twentieth Century (Kluwer: Dordrecht).

Geog471. 2021. Geography department. Vancouver Density: https://ibis. geog.ubc.ca/courses/geob479/classof08/vandensify/introduction.html

Habibi, S., Zebardast, E. 2016. How Compact Are Midsize Cities in Iran? Urban Plann. Dev., 142(4):1-11.

Hidalgo, D. 2022. Curitiba is evolving but remains a model for urban sustainability. https://city2city.ne twork/curitiba-evolving-remains-model-urban-sustainability

Holdon, E., Norland, I. 2005. Three challenges for the compact city as a sustainable urban form: Household consumption of energy and transport in eight residential areas in the greater Oslo region. ”. Urban Studies, 42(12): 2145 – 2166.

IBGE. 2017. GE releases population estimates for municipalities in 2017. Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics (IBGE) (August 30, 2017)". Ibge.gov.br. Archived from the original on 12 June 2018. Retrieved at 30 August 2017. https://cidades.ib ge.gov.br/brasil/pr/curitiba/panorama

Ismael, H. 2021. Urban form study: the sprawling city—review of methods. GeoJournal, 86: 1785–1796.

Jenks, M., Burgess, R. 2000. Compact Cities:Sustainable Urban Forms for Developing Countries. . London and New York: Spon Press.

Jenks, M., Burton, E., Williams, K. 2005. The Compact City: A Sustainable Urban Form. . Oxford: Spon Press.

Jenks, M., Dempsey, N. 2007. Defining the neighbourhood: Challenges for empirical research. The. Town planning review, 78(2): 153-177.

Jia, M., Zhang, H., Yang, Z. 2022. Compactness or sprawl: Multi-dimensional approach to understanding the urban growth patterns in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region, China. Ecological Indicators, 138: 1-11.

Jun, M.J. 2020. The effects of polycentric evolution on commute times in a polycentric compact city: A case of the Seoul Metropolitan Area. Cities, 98.

Kjæras, K. 2020. Towards a relational conception of the compact city. Urban Studies, 58(6): 1176–1192.

Kühn, M. 2003. “Greenbelt and Green Heart: separating and integrating landscapes in European city regions”. Landscape and Urban Planning, 64: 19-27.

Kotulla, T., Denstadli, J., Oust, A., Beusker, E. 2019. What Does It Take to Make the Compact City Liveable for Wider Groups? Identifying Key Neighbourhood and Dwelling Features. Sustainability, 11: 1-18.

Lambregts, B., Kloosterman, R. 2005. Commuting & the Definition of Functional Urban Regions. Institute of Community Studies/The Young Foundation & Polynet Partners, - Contributions: Polynet Partner Members - Selection & editorial material: Peter Hall & Kathy Pain.

Lan, T., Shao, G., Xu, Z., Tang, L., Sun, L. 2021. Measuring urban compactness based on functional characterization and human activity intensity by integrating multiple geospatial data sources. Ecological Indicators, 121: 1-12.

Lee, J., Kurisu, K., An, K. 2014. Development of the compact city index and its application to Japanese cities. SAGE Journals, Urban Studies, 52(6): 1054-1070.

Lee, S., Yoo, C., Ha , J., Seo, J. 2018. Are perceived neighbourhood built environments associated with social capital? Evidence from the 2012 Seoul survey in South Korea. International Journal of Urban Sciences, 22(3): 349–365.

Mouratidis, K. 2019. Compact city, urban sprawl, and subjective well-being. Cities, 92: 261–272.

Mouratidis, K. 2022. COVID-19 and the compact city: Implications for well-being and sustainable. Science of the Total Environment, 811: 2-11.

Muzayanah, E., Nazara, S., Mahi, B., Hartono, D. 2022. Social capital vs. anonymity? 3Ds Urban form and social capital development in Indonesian cities. International Journal of Urban Sustainable Development, 14(1): 108-125.

Newman, P., Kenworthy, J. 1999. Sustainability and Cities: Overcoming Automobile Dependence. Island Press.

Organization, World Health. 2014. Global Health Observatory (GHO) data. Urban population growth: https://www.who.int/g ho/urban_health/situation_trends/urban_population_growth/en/

Pratt, R., Larkham, P. 1996. Who will care for compact cities? in The Compact City: A Sustainable Urban Form? Eds M Jenks, E Burton, K Williams. London: Spon .

Rubiera-Morollón, M., Garrido-Yserte, R. 2020. Recent Literature about Urban Sprawl: A Renewed Relevance of the Phenomenon from the Perspective of Environmental Sustainability. Sustainability, 12.

Sakamoto, K., Iida, A., Yokohari, M. 2018. Spatial patterns of population turnover in a Japanese Regional City for urban regeneration against population decline: Is Compact City policy effective? Cities, 81: 230–241.

Sherlock, H. 1996. ``Repairing our much abused cities: the way to sustainable living'',. Eds M Jenks, E Burton, K Williams içinde, in The Compact City: A Sustainable Urban Form? (s.289-297). London: Spon.

Shrivastava, P. 2009. Exploring Compact city: Reconfiguring the Compact City. Ball State University Muncie, Indiana : A thesis submitted to the graduate school in partial fulfillment for the degree of master of architecture.

Singapore Population. 2020. https://www.worldometers.info/world-population/singapore-population/#:~:text=Singapore%20population%20is%20equivalent%20to,21%2C646%20people%20per%20mi2).

Singapur Compact City Approach. 2022, April 21. Urban diary. https://urbandiarist.wordpress.com/2014/04/21/singapore-compact-city-approach-public-housing-lesson-for-asian-countries/#:~:text=Singapore%20is%20an%20essential%20example,system%20development%20for%20the%20society.

Snellen, D., Hilbers, H. 2007. mobility and congestion impacts of Dutch VINEX Policy. Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie, 98(3): 398-406.

Stathakis , D., Tsilimigkas, G. 2014. Measuring the compactness of European medium-sized cities by spatial metrics based on fused datasets. International Journal of Image and Data Fusion, 5(4): 42-64 .

Tan, J., Ee, D. 2019. Ground Breaking :60 Years of National Development. MND Singapore , The Centre for Liveable Cities.

The Canadian Encyclopedia. 2021). Last Edited on March 12, 2019. Vancouver: https://thecanadia nencyclopedia.ca/en/article/vancouver?gclid=Cj0KCQiA0rSABhDlARIsAJtjfCdkjHgBACqYh_DZiVcbE5S4r6VjuKb60rEpMh8evu9pIksgmUdB86kaAsT8EALw_wcB

Van Der Valk, A., Faludi, A. 2002. Growth Regions and the Future of Dutch Planning Doctrine. in Sustainable Development and Urban Form Ed M. Breheny (Pion Limited, London) (s. 122-137 ). içinde

Wang, H. 2022. Prioritizing compactness for a better quality of life: The case of U.S. cities. Cities, 123: 1-12.

Wikipedia. 2021. Randstad.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Randstad#:~:text=With%20a%20population%20density%20of,Rotterdam%E2%80%93The%20Hague%20metropolitan%20area.

Wikipedia. 2021. Vancouver. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vancouver

World Population Review. 2020. Curitiba Population 2020. https://worldpopulationreview.com/world-cities/curitiba-population

Downloads

Published

2022-12-23

How to Cite

ERAY, S. S., & ÖKSÜZ, A. M. (2022). Compact City: A Comparative Study of Urban Policies. MAS Journal of Applied Sciences, 7(Özel Sayı), 1246–1262. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7472639

Issue

Section

Articles