Quantitative Evaluation of Advanced Product Quality Planning (APQP) Implementation for Planetary Sun Gear Manufacturing: A Risk-Driven and Capability-Based Case Study
1 COEP Technological University (COEP Tech), School of Engineering and Technology, Department of Manufacturing Engineering and Industrial Management, Pune: 411005, Maharashtra State, India
2 Divgi TorqTransfer Systems Ltd., MIDC, Bhosari, Pimpri-Chinchwad, Pune: 411026, Maharashtra State, India
3 SRH Berlin University of Applied Sciences, Department of Engineering and Sustainable Technology Management, Engineering and Sustainable Technology Management in Industry 4.0: Automation, Robotics & 3D Manufacturing, Berlin, Germany
4 ASSA ABLOY Entrance Systems, National Industries Park (NIP), Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
Abstract
Automotive driveline components require high-dimensional precision and durability due to strict torque-transmission and noise, vibration, and harshness (NVH) performance requirements. Despite this, several manufacturing programs continue to rely on corrective quality practices, which often lead to delayed problem identification, increased rework, and higher production costs. This study investigates the implementation of Advanced Product Quality Planning (APQP) in planetary sun gear manufacturing through a quantitative industrial case study. The work combines APQP phase mapping with Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA), Statistical Process Control (SPC), Measurement System Analysis (MSA), and process capability assessment to establish a preventive quality planning approach. The implementation led to a considerable reduction in high-risk Process FMEA (PFMEA) issues before process freeze and improved overall manufacturing stability. Critical-to-quality (CTQ) parameters achieved capable and consistent performance, with capability values exceeding accepted industrial benchmarks. In addition, First Pass Yield (FPY) improved considerably, while pilot-stage rework was significantly reduced. Measurement system variation also improved after corrective MSA actions were introduced. The study further proposes an integrated risk-capability-gate scoring framework to strengthen the relationship between project governance and process readiness evaluation. The findings demonstrate that APQP can serve as an effective quality management methodology when supported by statistical validation and structured decision-making. Future research may focus on digital APQP systems, AI-assisted FMEA optimisation, and Industry 4.0-based real-time quality monitoring for predictive manufacturing control.
Keywords
Planetary Sun Gear,Failure Mode and Effects Analysis,Statistical Process Control,Process Capability
How to Cite
SURYAVANSHI , A. P., PATIL , S. M., SHIVDAS , R. K., DUSANIS , A. B., SHINDE , P. S., & PATIL , M. A. (2026). Quantitative Evaluation of Advanced Product Quality Planning (APQP) Implementation for Planetary Sun Gear Manufacturing: A Risk-Driven and Capability-Based Case Study. MAS Journal of Applied Sciences, 11(2), 304–322. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20425527
📄Amer, Y., Soufali, A., Zaghwan, A., 2026. A digital twin-based framework for predictive quality assurance and supply chain resilience in the automotive industry. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 69(C):103969.
📄Arcidiacono, G., Nuzzi, S., 2017. A review of the fundamentals on process capability, process performance, and process sigma, and an introduction to process sigma split. International Journal of Applied Engineering Research, 12(14):4556-4570.
📄Aravindan, S., Maiti, J., 2012. A framework for integrated analysis of quality defects in supply chain. Quality Management Journal, 19(1):34-52.
📄Avramova, T., Vasileva, D., Peneva, T., 2024. An overview of the basic concepts and terms related to manufacturing process capability evaluation. AIP Conference Proceedings, 3104(1):020011.
📄Bachhav, P.D., Patil, S.M., Jadhav, M.S., Kene, H.D., 2026. MES-driven digitalization in automotive stamping ındustry: a case study of tandem press line. Science Essence Journal, 42(1): 14-49.
📄Bachhav, P.D., Patil, S.M., Jadhav, M.S., Kene, H.D., 2025. Leveraging MES integration for operational excellence in a green field automotive stamping plant: A digital transformation case study. International Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 14(4): 808-817.
📄Borucka, A., Kozłowski, E., Antosz, K., Parczewski, R., 2023. A new approach to production process capability assessment for non-normal data. Applied Sciences, 13(11):6721.
📄Deshpande, A.M., Siddhalingeshwar, I.G., Ekabote, N., 2016. Implementation of advanced product quality planning in engineering project. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, SI:1-5.
📄Giampieri, A., Ling-Chin, J., Ma, Z., Smallbone, A., Roskilly, A.P., 2020. A review of the current automotive manufacturing practice from an energy perspective. Applied Energy, 261:114074.
📄Hamand, Y.C., Kalamkar, V., 2011. Analysis of stresses and deflection of sun gear by theoretical and ANSYS method. Modern Mechanical Engineering, 1(2):56-68.
📄Hjelm, R., 2023. Modelling and simulation of gearset behavior: effects of manufacturing errors and electrification. PhD Thesis, Department of Mechanical Engineering of Lund University, Lund.
📄Horvath, K., Feszty, D., 2025. Surface waviness of EV gears and NVH effects—a comprehensive review. World Electric Vehicle Journal, 16(9):540.
📄Horvath, K., Zelei, A., 2025. Digital twin approaches for gear NVH optimisation: a literature review of modeling, data integration, and validation gaps. Machines, 13(12):1141.
📄Khamkar, A.D., Patil, S.M., 2024a. Digital twin in fluid power: reviewing constituents. International Research Journal of Multidisciplinary Scope, 5(1):750-765.
📄Khamkar, A.D., Patil, S.M., 2024b. Digital twin in fluid power: review- technology trends. International Research Journal of Multidisciplinary Scope, 5(2):596-610.
📄Khamkar, A.D., Patil, S.M., 2024c. Digital twin in fluid power: Review–Uses and outlook. International Research Journal of Multidisciplinary Scope, 5(3):79-96.
📄Kenda, M., Klobčar, D., Bračun, D., 2021. Condition-based maintenance of the two-beam laser welding in high-volume manufacturing of a piezoelectric pressure sensor. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 59:117-126.
📄Kiral, I.A., 2025. Contextual evaluation of risk identification techniques for construction projects: comparative insights and a decision-support model. Buildings, 15(20):3806.
📄Molaie, M., Zippo, A., Pellicano, F., 2025. Nonlinear dynamics of bevel gears: a comprehensive review. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 215:106161.
📄Najib, R., Neufond, J., Franco, F., Petrone, G., De Rosa, S., 2025. Effect of manufacturing tolerances and uncertainties on the NVH response of spur and helical gears: a review. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, 239(16):6648-6676.
📄Nalande, N.V., Patil, S.M., Shivdas, R.K., Nalande, V.V., 2025. Deep learning for vibration signature analysis in CNC turning: a review of modern techniques and future directions. International Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 14(4):578-590.
📄Parashare, G.R., 2024. Best practices for measurement system analysis (MSA) implementation in complex manufacturing environments. International Journal of Scientific Research and Management, 12(04): 1180-1199.
📄Patil, P.S., Patil, S.S., Patil, S.M., Dhanvijay, M.R., 2024. Development of MS excel and power bi integrated production scheduling system for an MSME. Engineering Access, 10 (2):124-142.
📄Patil, S.M., Dhone, N.C., Chourasiya, R.H., 2023. Industry 4.0 technologies in the context of supply chain management 4.0. The Online Journal of Distance Education and e-Learning 11(2):2348-2359.
📄Pinciroli, L., Hosseini, S.A., Chen, M., Mesa, M.V.C., Coscia, T.M., Futalef, J.P., Marchetti, S., Miqueles, L., Menza S.T., Zio, E., 2026. Risk assessment for modern industry. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 269:112126.
📄Rastegari, A., 2017. Condition-based maintenance in the manufacturing industry: from strategy to implementation. PhD Thesis, School of Innovation, Design and Engineering of Mälardalen University, Sweden.
📄Rasu, S., 2021. Optimising mechanical component development with APQP to reduce market entry delays. International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research, 3(5): IJFMR21059995.
📄Rydzi, S., Zahradnikova, B., Sutova, Z., Ravas, M., Hornacek, D., Tanuska, P., 2024. A predictive quality inspection framework for the manufacturing process in the context of Industry 4.0. Sensors, 24(17):5644.
📄Saikaew, C., 2018. An implementation of measurement system analysis for the assessment of machine and part variations in turning operations. Measurement, 118:246-252.
📄Secretariat, PIC/S, 2021. Annex 2A (Manufacture of advanced therapy medicinal products for human use). In PIC/S Secretariat (Ed.), Guide to good manufacturing practice for medicinal products annexes (pp. 19-52). Geneva: Pharmaceutıcal Inspectıon Conventıon - Pharmaceutıcal Inspectıon Co-Operatıon Scheme (PIC/S).
📄Shinde, B.G., Sanap, S.B., Pawar, S.S., Wakchaure, V.D., 2025. New product development process: a conceptual framework for automobile industries. International Journal of Systematic Innovation, 9(3):31-74.
📄Shinde, P.S., Patil, S.S., Poredi, C.S., Shelke, G.S., Subhedar, J.J., Dhanvijay, M.R., Patil, S.M., 2025a. Development and implementation of a smart single-station manual assembly cell for an inexperienced worker to enhance ındustrial efficiency in an MSME. Science Essence Journal, 41(2):241-274.
📄Shinde, P.S., Poredi, C.S., Shelke, G.S., Patil, S.S., Subhedar, J.J., Dhanvijay, M.R., Patil, S.M., 2025b. Transforming MSME assembly operations: smart manual assembly table for improved productivity. International Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 14(1):40-51.
📄Srinivasan, U., Mittel, D., Lemberger, D., Perzylo, A., 2026. Structured product engineering: ontology-based advanced product quality planning. Procedia CIRP, 138:1109-1114.
📄AIAG, 2024. Advanced product quality planning (APQP) reference manual (3rd Ed.). Southfield: Automotive Industry Action Group (AIAG).
📄Wang, Y., Yang, J., Guo, D., Lim, T.C., 2016. Vibration and sound radiation analysis of the final drive assembly considering the gear-shaft coupling dynamics. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, 230(7-8):1258-1275.
📄Wiangkham, A., Vongvit, R., 2026. Integrating machine learning with FMEA for failure prioritisation and process risk analysis in manufacturing. Results in Engineering, 29:109128.
📄Younus, H., Kabir, S., Campean, F., Bonnaud, P., Delaux, D., 2026. AI- and ontology-based enhancements to FMEA for advanced systems engineering: current developments and future directions. Applied Sciences, 16(5):2464.