Open Access

Unified Performance Assessment of OFDM, FBMC, F-OFDM, GFDM and UFMC Waveforms

University of Alkafeel, College of Engineering Technology, Department of Computer Engineering Technology, Najaf, Iraq

Abstract

Air-interface designs for fifth-generation (5G) and early sixth-generation (6G) networks must operate reliably across fragmented spectrum, dissimilar service profiles, tight latency budgets and multipath channels. Although cyclic prefix-orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (CP-OFDM) remains the baseline waveform in 5G New Radio (NR), many alternative multicarrier schemes rely on mismatched numerologies or idealised assumptions, limiting their value for practical system design. This study presents a unified and reproducible assessment of OFDM, filter bank multicarrier (FBMC), filtered OFDM (F-OFDM), generalised frequency division multiplexing (GFDM) and universal filtered multicarrier (UFMC) within a transmitter-channel-receiver framework using an NR-like 20 MHz configuration with a 30.72 MHz sampling rate, FFT/IFFT size M=2048, 1200 active subcarriers and cyclic prefix operation for OFDM-like schemes. The analysis combines structural overhead, transient behaviour and arithmetic complexity evaluations with Monte Carlo simulations of power spectral density, bit error rate and peak-to-average power ratio under additive white Gaussian noise, flat Rayleigh fading and the standardised 3GPP TDL-C channel model. Results show that FBMC achieves the strongest spectral confinement, F-OFDM and UFMC provide the best trade-off between spectral containment and implementation continuity, and GFDM offers block-level flexibility at the cost of higher receiver sensitivity. Overall, no single waveform is universally optimal, supporting scenario-driven waveform selection for 5G evolution and early-6G radio interfaces.

Keywords

How to Cite

RAMADHAN , A. J. (2026). Unified Performance Assessment of OFDM, FBMC, F-OFDM, GFDM and UFMC Waveforms. MAS Journal of Applied Sciences, 11(3), 643–663. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21812650

References

📄 Ben Chikha, H., Alaerjan, A., Jabeur, R., 2025. Automatic classification of 5G waveform-modulated signals using deep residual networks. Sensors, 25(15): 4682.
📄 Bodempudi, N.S.P., Chaturvedi, A.H.R., Kulkarni, M., 2025. Analysis of symbol error probability in GFDM under generalized α–κ–μ channels: An approach based on probability density function for beyond 5G wireless applications. AEU-International Journal of Electronics and Communications, 200: 155946.
📄 ETSI, 2024. ETSI TR 138 901 V18.0.0 (2024-05): 5G; Study on channel model for frequencies from 0.5 to 100 GHz (3GPP TR 38.901 version 18.0.0 Release 18). European Telecommunications Standards Institute, Sophia Antipolis, France.
📄 Farhang-Boroujeny, B., 2011. OFDM versus filter bank multicarrier. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 28(3): 92–112.
📄 Gerzaguet, R., Bartzoudis, N., Baltar, L. G., Berg, V., Doré, J. B., Kténas, D., Font-Bach, O., Mestre, X., Payaró, M., Färber, M., Roth, K., 2017. The 5G candidate waveform race: A comparison of complexity and performance. EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking, 2017(1): 13.