Open Access

Comparison of Generative Artificial Intelligence Performances in Climate Resilience Simulations in Urban Landscapes

Siirt University, Faculty of Fine Arts and Design, Departmant of Landscape Architecture, Siirt, Türkiye

Abstract

While the global climate crisis creates ecological, economic and social pressures on urban built environments, the discipline of landscape architecture develops adaptation strategies centering on nature-based solutions to combat these pressures. Reconstructing urban landscape areas in accordance with environmental resilience and sustainability principles requires expressing complex datasets in an aesthetic and understandable language. The main objective of this research is to comparatively examine the performances of generative artificial intelligence models capable of text-to-image conversion in the visual simulation of climate crisis adaptation strategies in the urban landscape, in light of computational metrics and statistical analyses. In this study, which adopts an experimental and quantitative research design, a total of 500 images were generated from both algorithms for five different designated climate adaptation strategy scenarios. The obtained images were analyzed using Structural Similarity Index (SSIM), Learned Perceptual Image Patch Similarity (LPIPS) and Contrastive Language-Image Pre-training (CLIP) Score algorithms. In the statistical analysis of the data, the non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test and the Independent Samples T-Test to verify the sub-distributions of the dataset were applied and effect sizes were formulated. The findings revealed that the Midjourney v6 model was statistically significantly superior to DALL-E 3 in LPIPS and SSIM scores, while the DALL-E 3 model showed significant success in responding to complex textual prompts as measured by the CLIP score. In conclusion, it has emerged that generative artificial intelligence tools can be integrated into urban landscape design processes as complementary decision support systems depending on the context of the subject and the stages of the design process.

Keywords

How to Cite

ALTUNTAŞ, A. (2026). Comparison of Generative Artificial Intelligence Performances in Climate Resilience Simulations in Urban Landscapes. MAS Journal of Applied Sciences, 11(2), 286–303. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20373499

References

📄 Benliay, A., Kılıç, A., 2024. Peyzaj tasarımı sunum tekniklerinde yapay zeka uygulamalarının değerlendirilmesi. PEYZAJ – Eğitim, Bilim, Kültür ve Sanat Dergisi, 6(1): 1-14.
📄 Cina, E., Elbasi, E., Elmazi, G., AlArnaout, Z., 2025. The role of ai in predictive modelling for sustainable urban development: challenges and opportunities. Sustainability, 17(11): 5148.
📄 Columbia University & Bezos Earth Fund, 2024. Landscape assessment of AI for climate and nature. Colombia University & Bezos Earth Fund. https://www.climate. columbia.edu/sites/default/files/content/research/AI%20for%20Climate%20&%20Nature%20-%20Bezos% 20Earth%20Fund/La ndscape%20Assessment%20of%20AI%20for%20Climate%20and%20Nature%20-% 20May%202024.pdf(Accessed: 24.01.2026).
📄 C40 Knowledge Hub, 2020. Integrating climate adaptation: A toolkit for urban planners and adaptation practitioners. C40 Knowledge Hub. https://www.c40kno wledgehub.org/s/article/Integrating-Clima te-Adaptation-A-toolkit-for-urban-pla nner s-and-adaptation-practitioners (Accessed: 05.01.2026).
📄 Çetin, N., Mansuroğlu, S., Önaç, A.K., 2018. Xeriscaping feasibility as an urban adaptation method for global warming: a case study from Turkey. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 27(3): 1009–1018.