Open Access

The Comparative Effects of Slow-Release and Conventional Urea Applications on Growth Dynamics and Quality Parameters in Wheat

1 Ege Üniversitesi, Ziraat Fakültesi, Toprak Bilimi ve Bitki Besleme Bölümü, İzmir
2 Ege Üniversitesi, Ziraat Fakültesi, Toprak Bilimi ve Bitki Besleme Bölümü, İzmir
3 Latro Kimya Dış Ticaret Anonim Şirketi, İstanbul
4 Latro Kimya Dış Ticaret Anonim Şirketi, İstanbul
5 Ege Üniversitesi, Mühendislik Fakültesi, Biyomühendislik Bölümü, İzmir
6 Ege Üniversitesi, Ziraat Fakültesi, Toprak Bilimi ve Bitki Besleme Bölümü, İzmir

Abstract

Nowadays, the use of slow-release nitrogen fertilizers is considered a good alternative, especially to reduce the negative environmental effects of nitrogen and to increase its usage efficiency. Furthermore, research in this area is increasing day by day. The study is a model study that aims to compare the wheat development, nitrogen (N) uptake, and utilization efficiency of slow-release urea (SRU) fertilizer, which is coated with a biodegradable natural material based on sodium alginate and enriched with additive components consisting of a mixture of humic acid, lysine HCL, and gluconic acid, with conventionally widely used urea (CU) fertilizer, which is traditionally widely used. In a pot experiment conducted under greenhouse conditions using the Kayra bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) variety, slow-release and conventional urea fertilizers were applied in increasing doses (0, 8, 16, 24 kg da⁻¹) in divided applications. and certain growth parameters (plant height, root length, root, stem, ear fresh and dry weights) and quality criteria (grain number, 1000-grain weight, and protein content) were determined. According to the results of the study, it was determined that the application of 16 kg da⁻¹ of SRU fertilizer could increase N uptake and grain protein content in wheat by approximately 5–10%, chlorophyll index and yield components by 10–15%. In this context, it is recommended that the long-term performance and potential environmental/economic impacts of SRU fertilizers formulated with different components and additives be verified through multi-location field trials on different soil types, climatic conditions, and wheat varieties.

Keywords

How to Cite

BAYIZ, O., BALLİ, E., DİNÇER, E., KARAÇAY, Özge, BAYRAKTAR , O., & ÇOLAK ESETLİLİ, B. (2025). The Comparative Effects of Slow-Release and Conventional Urea Applications on Growth Dynamics and Quality Parameters in Wheat. MAS Journal of Applied Sciences, 10(3), 569–587. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17007872

References

📄 Abalos, D., Jeffery, S., Sanz-Cobena, A., Guardia, G., Vallejo, A., 2014. Meta-analysis of the effect of urease and nitrification inhibitors on crop productivity and nitrogen use efficiency. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 189: 136–144.
📄 Ab Rahman, S.F.S., Singh, E., Pieterse, C.M., Schenk, P.M., 2018. Emerging microbial biocontrol strategies for plant pathogens. Plant Science, 267: 102–111.
📄 Agegnehu, G., Nelson, P.N., Bird, M.I., 2016. The effects of biochar, compost and their mixture and nitrogen fertilizer on yield and nitrogen use efficiency of barley grown on a Nitisol in the highlands of Ethiopia. Science of the Total Environment, 569–570: 869–879.
📄 Chen, J., Lu, S., Zhang, Z., Zhao, X., Li, X., Ning, P., Liu, M., 2018. Environmentally friendly fertilizers: A review of materials used and their effects on the environment. Science of the Total Environment, 613–614: 829–839.
📄 Conrad, J., 2000. Environmental policy regulation by voluntary agreements: Technical innovations for reducing use and emission of EDTA. FFU Report, 1–4.