Comparative Evaluation of Solar Tent Drying Efficiency and Product Quality for Blue Whiting (Micromesistius poutassou) and Hake (Merluccius spp.)


DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15757534Keywords:
Solar tent dryer, fish drying efficiency, ventilation configuration, species-specific dryingAbstract
This study investigates the drying efficiency and product quality of two economically significant non-fatty fish species, Blue Whiting (Micromesistius poutassou) and Hake (Merluccius spp.), using a solar tent dryer. The objective was to optimize dryer configurations, focusing on vent number and polyethylene covering materials to balance drying performance with product quality. The dryer, comprising a metal frame covered with either low-density polyethylene (LDPE, 50 µm) or medium-density polyethylene (MDPE, 250 µm), was tested under three ventilation regimes (2, 4, and 6 vents). A Face-Centered Central Composite Design (FCCCD) within Response Surface Methodology (RSM) assessed the effects of these variables on internal drying conditions. Across 30 experimental trials, temperature and relative humidity were monitored, and data were analysed using ANOVA and Duncan’s New Multiple Range Test (DNMRT) at a 5% significance level. The result shows that covering material and its interaction with fish species significantly affected internal temperature, with LDPE and MDPE achieving thermal retention up to 42 °C. Increased venting reduced temperature but raised humidity, indicating a trade-off between ventilation and thermal efficiency. A consistent U-shaped diurnal humidity profile was observed. Species-specific drying responses emerged: Hake dried faster and reached lower final moisture content, while Blue Whiting retained superior sensory properties, particularly colour and texture. Microbial analysis demonstrated significant reductions in viable bacterial counts post-drying. The findings highlight the critical influence of dryer design on solar drying efficiency, product safety, and sensory quality, offering practical insights for improving fish drying processes in resource-limited settings. . It is strongly suggested that similar research should be replicated in other states or regions for effective and conclusive submission vis-à-vis establishing one in optimal conditions for the sampled fish storage and processing.
References
Ajala, O.O., Akinnawo, S.O., Bamisaye, A., Adedipe, D.T., Adesina, M.O., Okon-Akan, O.A., Adebusuyi, T.A., Ojedokun, A.T., Adegoke, K.A., Bello, O.S., 2023. Adsorptive removal of antibiotic pollutants from wastewater using biomass/biochar-based adsorbents, RSC Advances, 13(13): 4678–4647.
Al Ashry, H.S., Modrykamien, A.M., 2014. Humidification during mechanical ventilation in the adult patient. Biomed Res Int, 2014, 715434.
Bala, B.K., 2017. Drying and storage of cereal grains. Springer.
Bala, B.K., Mondol, M.R.A., 2020. Solar drying: Fundamentals, modeling and applications. Springer Nature.
Banout, J., Ehl, P., Havlik, J., Kloucek, P., Lojka, B., Polesny, Z., Verner, V., 2011. Design and performance evaluation of a double-pass solar dryer for drying of red chilli. Solar Energy, 85(3): 37–45.
Behera, D.D., Mohanty, A.M., Mohanty, R.M., 2022. Recent advances in solar drying technologies: A Comprehensive review. Journal of Energy Systems, 6(4): 503-519.
Borkakoti, S., Das, B., Ahmad, A., Irshad, K., 2025. Performance analysis of cost-effective single-slope solar greenhouse dryer for drying of bay leaf (Laurus nobilis) and neem leaf (Azadirachta indica). Case Studies in Thermal Engineering, 72: 106298.
Clucas, I.J., Ward, A.R., 1996. Post-harvest fisheries development: A guide to handling, preservation, processing and quality. Chatham Maritime.
Dissa, A.O., Bathiebo, J., Desmorieux, H., Savadogo, P.W., Koulidiati, J., 2009. Modelling and experimental validation of thin layer indirect solar drying of mango slices. Renewable Energy, 34(4): 1000–1008.
Doe, P. E., Ahmed, M., 1977. A polythene tent dryer for improved sun drying of fish. Agricultural and Food Sciences. 29: 437–441.
Erkan, N., Özden, Ö., 2008. Proximate composition and mineral contents in aqua cultured sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax), sea bream (Sparus aurata) analyzed by ICP-MS. Food Chemistry, 108(3): 1120–1126.
FAO, 2022. The state of world fisheries and aquaculture. Food and Agriculture Organization. https://www.fao.org/publicati ons/home/fao-flagship-publications/the-state-of-world-fisheries-and-aquaculture/ (Accessed: 10.02.2025).
Fudholi, A., Sopian, K., Ruslan, M.H., Alghoul, M.A., Sulaiman, M.Y., 2010. Review of solar dryers for agricultural and marine products. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 14(1): 1–30.
Heffernan, S., Nunn, L., Harnedy-Rothwell, P.A., Gite, S., Whooley, J., Giblin, L., FitzGerald, R.J., O'Brien, N.M., 2022. Blue Whiting (Micromesistius poutassou) protein hydrolysates increase glp-1 secretion and proglucagon production in stc-1 cells whilst maintaining caco-2/ht29-mtx co-culture ıntegrity. Mar Drugs, 20(2): 112.
Jain, R., Paul, A.S., Sharma, D., Panwar, N.L., 2023. Enhancement in thermal performance of solar dryer through conduction mode for drying of agricultural produces. Energy Nexus, 9(2023): 100182.
Mehta, P., Samaddar, S., Patel P., Markam, B., Maiti, S., 2018. Design and performance analysis of a mixed mode tent-type solar dryer for fish-drying in coastal areas. Solar Energy, 170, 671–681.
Sagar, V. R., Kumar, P.S., 2010. Recent advances in drying and dehydration of fruits and vegetables: A review. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 47(1): 15–26.
Speranza, B., Racioppo, A., Bevilacqua, A., Buzzo, V., Marigliano, P., Mocerino, E., Scognamiglio, R., Corbo, M. R., Scognamiglio, G., Sinigaglia, M., 2021. Innovative preservation methods ımproving the quality and safety of fish products: beneficial effects and limits. Foods, 10(11): 2854.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 The copyright of the published article belongs to its author.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.